Cracking the code of the most important name in the universe

IEUE not YHWH

The word "IEUE" is the most accurate transliteration of our Creator's Name - NOT "YHWH".
Transcription should not be confused with transliteration. Transliteration is the process of mapping letters from one alphabet into another alphabet via letter-shape similarities and historical links, and is the is the MOST accurate way to determine ancient sounds. Transcription ON THE OTHER HAND is the process of matching the SOUNDS of human speech to letters.
"YHWH" is only a half accurate transliteration. The Y and W are accurate, but not the H's.
The letter Y is accurate because it evolved out of the letter I and the letter Y retains the Old English way of saying I - and I is the best English transliteration of the ancient Hebrew letter named "ID" (now called yod in modern Hebrew). The letter Y is NOT a consonant like we are taught in school, but a VOWEL. It is said as "EEH" in ALL FIVE modern SHaMitic (Semitic) alphabets - English, Greek, Hebrew, Syriac Aramaic and Arabic.
YES, the English and Greek alphabets are SHaMitic and we shall endeavour to prove that to you.
Likewise the letter W is accurate because it evolved out of the letter U and the letter W retains the Old English way of saying U - and U is the best transliteration of the ancient Hebrew letter named UU (now called vav in modern Hebrew). Again, the letter W is NOT a consonant like we are taught in school, but a VOWEL. It is said as"OOH" in ALL FIVE modern SHaMitic alphabets.
HOWEVER the letter H which comes from the modern Hebrew transliteration is NOT accurate. It should be an E. This is because compared to all other living SHaMitic alphabets -
1) The MAJORITY of the descendants of ISHaRaAL (Jacob) went on to use the English and Greek alphabets.
2) The Greek alphabet is OLDER than the modern square-script Hebrew alphabet, the Aramaic Syriac alphabet AND the Arabic alphabet. English evolved out of Ancient Greek.
3) The English and Greek alphabets have been used over a LARGER GEOGRAPHICAL AREA both today and throughout history.
4) There are MANY MORE ARTIFACTS with the Greek and English alphabets on them.
Therefore the letter "H" in the word "YHWH" actually DENIES that the lost tribes of ISHaRaAL (Israel) EXIST, and it denies that BOTH HOUSES have a ROLE TO PLAY in restoration of the CLEAN LIP in the rebuilding of TSIUN. The IDENTITY of the ALL OF THE TRIBES reveal the Sacred Name. When we know who we are, we can know who He is.
The Jews are not the only ISHaRaALites (Israelites), and the lost tribes did not disappear off the face of the Earth never to be seen again.
YES, the IEUEDIM have preserved most of the Hebrew words faithfully and some of the pronunciation of the original language, but the alphabets of the Northern House also have a very large role to play. In fact the English and Greek alphabet evolved out of the ancient Hebrew alphabet, JUST LIKE modern square-script Hebrew alphabet did. So ALL FIVE ShaMitic alphabets can help us decode the pronunciation of the tetragrammaton.
One of the biggest scams of all time is that ancient Hebrew had no vowel-letters. Ancient Hebrew had vowel-letters. In fact each and every letter of the renowned tetragrammaton is a vowel. The word "YHWH" only has two vowels - Y and W.
To add to this the ancient pictographic letter "H" means "divide" in ancient Hebrew so when we write "YHWH", we are calling our Creator "HE DIVIDES AND DIVIDES" which is none other than SHaTaN (Satan) himself. However IEUE means "HE BREATHES AND BREATHES". We can obtain this from the pictographic meaning of the word's ancient Hebrew letters. This is supported by the "I Work-at-Breathing (Exist)" and "I Work-at-Breathing (Exist)" or "I Am And Am" of Exodus 3:14.
"Yeh-weh" is a more of a transcription than a transliteration. It's Y,e, and w are transliterated letters but the h's are only there to sound the English e's correctly. The h's are silent in a modern English transcription and not throaty h's like in modern Hebrew.
The Son's Name means "IEUE Saves" and in ancient Hebrew is best transliterated as IEUESHUO E MaSHICH. Its transcription is "Yeh-weh-shwo Eh Masheech".
The letters that comprise the Names of the Creator and His Son have been the most attacked by SHaTaN (Satan) over the entire course of history. These letters are equivalent to the English I, E, U, SH and O. He did not need to alter the all of the scriptures, only the letters that save us.

Ancient Hebrew - More Like English and Greek

The modern Hebrew alphabet does not give us the best indication of the pronunciation of the ancient Hebrew alphabet. The English and Greek alphabets have more credence in our determination of the pronunciation of ancient Hebrew. This is because English and Greek are Hebrew-Semitic alphabets.
Spot the Difference
Out of all alphabets in use today, the English (and Greek alphabets) are the most similar in appearance to the ancient Hebrew alphabet. This is not a coincidence.

English Alphabet Evolved from Ancient Hebrew Alphabet
The English alphabet is just as, if not, more, "Hebrew" than the modern Hebrew alphabet. This is because there are more Hebrews speaking it today than modern Hebrew. Also there aren't so many alphabets in between it and the ancient Hebrew alphabet.
The English/Latin alphabet
came from the Etruscan alphabet,
which came from the Paleo Greek alphabet
which came from the Phoenician alphabet,
which came from the Paleo Hebrew alphabet,
which came from the Ancient Hebrew alphabet.
The Modern Hebrew alphabet
came from the Qumran Hebrew alphabet,
which came from the Palmyrenean Aramaic alphabet,
which came from the Nabataean Aramaic alphabet,
which came from the Elephantine Aramaic alphabet,
which came from the Paleo Aramaic alphabet,
which came from the Paleo Hebrew alphabet,
which came from the Ancient Hebrew alphabet.
Many people are aware that modern Hebrew, Syriac (Aramaic) and Arabic are related. What they don't know is that English and Greek are also part of the exact same "Hebrew and Semitic" alphabetic family. All five alphabets are the predominant alphabets used today by the descendants of IOQAB (Jacob) and OSHU (Esau)...Continue

 Hieroglyphic Ancient Hebrew

The 22 Letters of the Ancient Hebrew Alphabet
The Ancient Hebrew Alphabet Chart by J E Marchant is a detailed analysis of the meanings, sounds and names of each letter in the ancient Hebrew alphabet. It shows how similar ancient Hebrew is to English and Greek (with some exceptions). Shown below is a jpeg of the chart. For a clearer image see AHAC_JEM_8_pdf.pdf.

Ancient Hebrew Research Center
The Ancient Hebrew Research Center provides a wealth of archaeological evidence for the ancient Hebrew alphabet’s appearance and meaning. It also provides deep insight into the thought, culture and language of ancient Hebrews.
The First Alphabet on Earth
The Ancient Hebrew alphabet has been called the first alphabet on Earth. The BBC reported in 1999 that US scientists believe they have found the earliest surviving alphabet in ancient limestone inscriptions found in Egypt.
The Study of Edenics proposes that ancient Hebrew is the original language of man, and influences all other languages. Ancient Hebrew is sometimes called Early Hebrew, Proto-Canaanite or Proto-Semitic. The ancient Hebrew alphabet was pictographic. Pictographs are otherwise known as picture-letters, glyphs or hieroglyphs.
Ancient Hebrew Pictographs are Not Egyptian
Ancient Hebrew is not Egyptian, even though it has been found in Egypt. The Ancient Egyptians mainly adopted ancient Hebrew picture-letters after IEUEXaP (Joseph) introduced it to them. Then they were inspired by it to create their own plethora of pictographs. Before then the Egyptians had no hieroglyphs of their own.
Just because a language uses hieroglyphs it does not mean than language is Egyptian. There are many other hieroglyphic alphabets apart from Ancient Egyptian. For example Cretan (from the Island of Crete in the Mediterranean), Anatolian, Mayan, Olmec, and Míkmaq - all of which were inspired by the ancient Hebrew alphabet.
Ancient Hebrew is Older than Cuneiform
Cuneiform (wedge) inscriptions actually evolved out of ancient Hebrew (and not vice versa).
Early Cuneiform is pictographic and evolved out of ancient Hebrew pictographs. The wedge shapes came later.
Ancient Hebrew is Not Paleo Hebrew
Ancient Hebrew is between 6000 to 3500 years old. This makes it at least 500 years older than Paleo Hebrew. The Ancient Hebrew alphabet was used from Creation until the time the ISHaRaALites started to resettle in the land of ISHaRaAL (post Egyptian Exodus). Then by the time of the Golden Age of King DUD and SHaLaME (David and Solomon) Paleo Hebrew had been adopted by the ISHaRaALites.
The Paleo Hebrew alphabet is not the oldest form of Hebrew because it is not pictographic - it is linear. It cannot explain the reasons why specific letters or sounds are used in Hebrew words. Also it can't explain why the ancient versions of today's non-semitic alphabets (and extinct ancient alphabets) are pictographic and similar to the ancient Hebrew pictographs. It doesn't look like many alphabets, except Semitic ones like Greek, Etruscan and English. Paleo Hebrew cannot be the mother alphabet of Earth's languages.
The Southern House who went into exile into Babylon took the Paleo Hebrew alphabet with them. Once here certain scribes changed Paleo Hebrew into the "Elephantine Aramaic alphabet (what some call the Late Hebrew alphabet - remember - the English and Greek alphabets are just as Hebrew).
The diagram on the left shows Early (Ancient) Hebrew, Middle (Paleo) Hebrew, Late Hebrew (Elephantine Aramaic) and Modern (Square/Jewish-Script) Hebrew.
Where Ancient Hebrew Inscriptions Have Been Found
Most ancient Hebrew inscriptions have been found in Egypt. This is because the ISHaRaALite (Israelite) slaves graffitied the mines in which they worked. These mines happened to be ideal for the preservation of rock inscriptions - dry and dark. Here is one particular location that has yielded many inscriptions.
Serabit el-Khadim, Sinai Peninsula, Egypt

(4:09) This is a History Channel excerpt from the programme The Naked Archaeologist. It shows an ancient Hebrew inscription that is about 3500 years old. It is situated in an old slave mine called Serabit el-Khadim in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt.
The presenter Simcha Jacobovici says that the alphabet of this inscription is the basis for the Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Latin, English and Arabic alphabets.
The inscription reads, "AL - Save Me", and not "El - Save Me" as he erroneously points out. An aleph was said as an "A" or "ah" sound, just like it does in English, Greek and Arabic today - it is not a silent letter.
For more ancient Hebrew inscriptions see the Virtual Museum of Early Hebrew by the Ancient Hebrew Research Center.
Khirbet Qeiyafa Shard Found in Oct 08 Not Oldest Hebrew Inscription
Archaeologists in Israel said on Oct 30th 2008 that they had unearthed the oldest Hebrew inscription ever found at Khirbet Qeiyafa, Israel. However the ancient Hebrew inscriptions found in the mines of the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt are believed to be at least 500 years older by other ancient Hebrew scholars...Continue
The Setting Where the Ancient Hebrew Letters Came From
Ancient Hebrew letters were formulated from and named after real-life everyday objects that surrounded the nomadic peoples.

Ancient Hebrew TSITSIT
Ancient tsitsit (tzitzit) were not four tassels pinned or sewn to four rectangular corners. Instead they were fringes along all hems of a garment with a ribbon of blue above it. The "four corners" of a garment were interpreted as the hems. The Earth is described as having four corners - but it's not a square. No practical, historically biblical garment (the tunic - for men and women) is a square, but it does have a hole for your head, arms and feet to come out of - ie four orifices with edges or "ends"...Continue
Ancient Hebrew Days
Ancient Hebrew days began at sunrise, and they still do. Hebrew "evening" does not mean "night". Ancient Hebrew "day" means "working and attaching mightily", ie "producing vigorously". Ancient Hebrew "night" means "no work, no exertion". Night is not part of the ancient Hebrew day. Ancient Hebrew "evening" means "looking primarily home" ie, "heading home". Ancient Hebrew meaning of "morning" is "ploughing at sunrise". Morning is only first half of ancient Hebrew Day. There are shadows in the evening. The evening comes before the night. There are 12 hours in a day. "Tomorrow" Means the "Time of Mighty Sunburn". Daytime (IUM) is more often quoted before nighttime (LILE). Morning (BaQaR) is more often quoted before afternoon (ORaB). Other Scriptural Proof of Sunrise Day-Start. Nighttime is default rest time. IEUE comes first, so light must come first. The Fixed Order of Day then Night is Just Like Our Covenant with IEUE. Genesis Has Been Reordered? (!) The Danger in Latching on from One System to Another. Day of Atonement Starts at Sunrise. Sun Worship is No Excuse...Continue
The Ancient Hebrew Day of Atonement (IUM KIPUR) started at sunrise of the tenth period of light in the seventh month. This annual High ShaBaT (rest day) lasted for 12 hours, as all other annual and weekly ShaBaTs did. Leviticus 23:32 does not teach a sunset day-start. No matter how long a day is viewed as, and no matter when a day starts, this verse nullifies and/or contradicts a plethora of other scriptures...Continue
All Hebrew Words have Pictographic Roots
The meaning of all Hebrew words come from the ancient pictographic (hieroglyphic) meaning of each of their letters. For example
Meaning of ALEIM (Elohim) in Ancient Hebrew
"Mightiest Speaking Older Yoked Ox of all Speaking Older Yoked Oxen" or "Strong Authority (that) Speaks (and) Works Mightily"...Continue

Meaning of AL SHaDI (El Shaddai) in Ancient Hebrew
"Mighty Teat" or "Mighty Nourisher"...Continue
Meaning of ELaLUIE (Alleluia) in Ancient Hebrew
The phrase for "alleluia" in ancient Hebrew means "Make IE shine like a star", or "Shine IE like a star, you people". It is pronounced in ancient Hebrew as "ELaL-U-IE" (eh-lal-oo-yeh). It is a shortened form of the more common and reverent scriptural expression "ELaLUIEUE"...Continue
Meaning of HhaDaSH (Month) in Ancient Hebrew
"Entrance of the outside (of the moon) that is sharp at two ends" or "first crescent of the moon as the renewal of the moon, the first day of the month"...Continue
Meaning of TUREh (Torah) in Ancient Hebrew
"Boundaries (laws) that secure peoples' lives"...Continue
Meaning of IUM TaRUOE (Day of Trumpets) in Ancient Hebrew
"First sign to secure, watch and lookout", ie initial indication or alarm that was given to groups of people to secure, watch over and look-out for their family and property, in the case of an emergency, war, or a set-apart time of rejoicing...Continue
Meaning of ACHUT (Sister) in Ancient Hebrew
The word for "sister" in ancient Hebrew means "Protector that Bonds and Impresses". It is pronounced in ancient Hebrew as "ACHUT" (ah-choot/ah-hhoot/ah-khoot)...Continue

Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible (AHLB)
These words are just the tip of the iceberg. The Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible (AHLB) by Jeff Benner at the Ancient Hebrew Research Center, contains the pictographic meaning of many scriptural Hebrew words, roots and letters. It comes in hard cover, e-book - or you can download the AHLB for FREE as an e-sword module. Read Review by J E Marchant.
Ancient Hebrew Had Vowel-Letters
The ancient Hebrew alphabet did have vowel-letters – A, E, I, O, and U which correspond to the sounds “ah, eh, eeh, oh, and ooh” - just like the vowels of numerous modern alphabets. Many of these alphabets evolved out of the "mother" ancient Hebrew, so the mother alphabet must have had vowels also.
As mentioned previously. In ancient times these letters were formulated from and named after real-life everyday objects that surrounded the nomadic peoples. The names of the vowels were Al, Ea, Id, Oin and Uu. Al was an ox-head, Ea was a man with his arms raised, Id was a hand, Oin was an eye, and Uu a tent peg. These letters evolved into aleph, heh, yod, ayin and vav in the modern Hebrew alphabet.
Deliberate Vowels
The Creator deliberately used four vowels so we could know his Name. If he had used even just one consonant, the combinations, like the number of a safe’s possible combinations would be humungous. To say that Hebrew has no vowel-letters and that Y, H, and V (from YHVH) are all consonants would mean we could never know the pronunciation, since the range of vowels in between each consonant would produce a very large number of possibilities. (Besides, "Y" isn't even a consonant, it's pronounced as “ee”, like a Greek iota, "I", is today, and always has been. And "W" isn't a consonant either, it's pronounced as "ooh".)
Only Vowels Bring Life
The meaning of an ancient Hebrew picture-letter (also called a glyph or a pictographs) can also tell us whether the letter was a vowel or consonant even. The letter "E" in the name IEUE is a vowel. A vowel is only breathed. The ancient letter "Ea" for "E" (modern Hebrew "heh") means to "breathe" or "exist". Therefore the letter was breathed. In fact His whole name is breathed "ee-eh-oo-eh". There are four vowels and no consonants. It's full of life and breath. He gives us eternal life, since He is the Eternal One, so His Name must be breathed.
Both ABaRaM (Abram) and SHaRI (Sarai) both had the letter named EA, said as "Eh" added to their names. They had become parents finally and hence contributors to many more LIVES. The name ABaRaM (H87) turned into ABaREM (H85) and the name SHaRI (H8297) turned into SHaRE (H8283). That the letter E represents IEUE's LIFE and SPIRIT is clear.
YHWH/IHUH/YHUH Means "He Divides And Divides" NOT "He Is And Is"
This meaning of the letter "Ea" (E) proves that there is no "H" sound in the Father's Name. An "H" (hard or soft) is produced by closing the back of the throat - it is not a vowel, and is not breathed.
Therefore when people say "Yod Heh Vav Heh", or a variant involving the "H" (hard/guttoral or soft/non guttoral), they are denying the eternalness of "He Breathes And Breathes", or "He Is And Is". Instead they are calling him "He Divides And Divides": which is none other than SHaTaN (Satan) himself!
The Real, Eternal "He Is And Is" of Exodus Chapter Three
The meaning of the Name given in Exodus chapter three also confirms that the start of the Name is "Yeh" " and not "Yah". The eternal meaning of "I Am That I Am" implies that the second letter has to be pronounced the same as the fourth in order for ALEIM (God) to be eternal. IEUE's second and fourth letters are both the same letter (Ea) and this means "life" or "exist". His Name means "He is and is".

The first letter, "id", on the far right represents "He" - as in he, she or me. The picture of this letter is a hand which means "to work as" or "he", a worker. All beings such as humans, ALEIM and MaLaAKIM (angels) work and create.
The second letter, "ea" represents "exists". The picture of this letter is a man with arms raised which means to breath, sigh - or be alive - ie exist.
The third letter, "uu" represents "and". The picture of this letter is a tent peg which means to attach, hook or "and".
Combining all four letters we get HE-IS-AND-IS, or HE-EXISTS-AND-EXISTS. In other words He wasn't becoming or not becoming anything. He just is. The eternal one - beyond time and space.
"I Am and Am", "AEIE ASHaR AEIE" (ancient Hebrew) said as "Ehyeh asher Ehyeh" in modern Hebrew, is what IEUE calls himself. It's an explanation that leads up to the Name that we are to call Him. "IEUE" is a third-person-tense abbreviation of "AEIE ASHaR AEIE", and is what we are to call Him - otherwise we'd be praying to ourselves.
This is what IEUE was trying to tell MaSHE (Moses). Pharaoh worshipped a multitude of pagan "gods" each with a different name.
"The Egyptians worshipped many pagan gods. They assigned to each of these gods a name that represented its specific characteristics" The Illustrated Guide to Bible Customs & Curiosities, George Knight.
MaSHE felt that he needed a name to use before Pharaoh to distinguish his Hebrew ALEIM from all the other ALEIMs, and that his ALEIM was superior to the rest.
MaSHE had learned Egyptian magic and science and knew that you can conjure up a being by knowing their name. This is why it is important to know the Name and pronounce it correctly. IEUE invented mantras though, not the pagans. The Egyptians copied the ancient Hebrews.
“They [mantras] are primarily used as spiritual conduits, words or vibrations that instill one-pointed concentration in the devotee.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantra
So just as MaSHE wanted, IEUE ALEIM gave Pharaoh just what he needed - in His usual style - the Name of all names - IEUE. The Al (God) who actually exists. The real one.
For more see IEUE - He Is And Is.

Yahweh Means "He Strong And Is" NOT "He Is And Is"
The word "Yah-weh" or "IAUE" (Ee-ah-ooh-eh) means "He Strong and Is" not "He Is And Is". The “ah” sound in ancient Hebrew is especially reserved for the letter "Al" (the aleph) and means power, leader and strong. Our ALEIM certainly is strong, and the phrase “He-Strong And Is” doesn't sound that bad, but this is not His Name, and it is not His essence. The main thing is, He is our only existing, and hence true, ALEIM.

How to Say the Sacred Names
For a quick tutorial on how the Creator and His Son's Name should be pronounced click here.

Use of IEUE by Early Theologians

Josephus 37 to ~100AD
Josephus, also known as Yosef Ben Matityahu (Joseph, son of Matthias), who became known, in his capacity as a Roman citizen, as Titus Flavius Josephus, was a 1st-century Jewish historian and apologist of priestly and royal ancestry who survived and recorded the Destruction of Jerusalem in 70. His works give an important insight into first-century Judaism.
He confirmed the tetragrammaton had four vowels by stating in his observations of the High Priest in the first century AD that,
“A mitre also of fine linen encompassed his head, which was tied by a blue ribbon, about which there was another golden crown, in which was engraven the sacred name [of God]: it consists of four vowels”
(Wars of the Jews (Chapter V, section 7).
The four vowels are also verified, per Josephus, because he said that ancient historians familiar with Zerubbabel and others, saw these four vowels with their own eyes.

Source:http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Opera/1624/phoenician1.html

Petrus Alphonsi 1062-1110
Also known as Peter Alfonsi; born Moses Sepharadi, was a Jewish Spanish writer and astronomer, and polemicist, who converted to Christianity. He was educated in Arabic and Hebrew and was interested in science, particularly astronomy. He used diagrams of the trinity and tetragrammaton using the Name IEUE. (IEUE is not a trinity, but this still adds evidence that IEUE was in use by early theologians).

Source:Wikipedia Image:Tetragrammaton-Trinity-diagram-12thC.jpg

Source: St Johns College, Cambridge University

Is IEUE a Trinity?
ALEIM (Elohim) means, "Strong Authority (that) Speaks (and) Works Mightily", not three persons. 100 scriptural arguments against the trinity. 34 reasons why the Holy Spirit isn't a separate person from the Father. Is ALEIM an incomprehensible mystery? Errors of the trinity. Why the trinity is a stumbling block to unbelievers...Continue
Is IEUESHUO "God"?
IEUESHUO is not the Great I Am. The non-pre-existent Son. Who IEUESHUO MaSHICH is. When IEUESHUO became "God". Problems with the doctrine of the Double Nature of MaSHICH. Two thrones in the Book of Revelation. One Master and one ALEIM. IEUESHUO the MaSHICH is not the Almighty IEUE. The historic translation of John 1:3-5. But what about John 1:1? 47 reasons why our heavenly Father has no equals or co-equals. Understanding John 10:30. Understanding John 8:58b. IEUESHUO did not say, "I Am He (God)", but, "I am He (the MaSHICH)". IEUESHUO MaSHICH - Incarnated or Created? Isaiah 9:6. Is IEUESHUO "IEUE" in the TaNaK? IEUESHUO - IEUE's right-hand man. Can we worship IEUESHUO MaSHICH? Revelation 1:8...Continue
Joachim of Fiore, Italy 1135-1202
Joachim of Fiore, also known as Joachim of Flora and in Italian Gioacchino da Fiore (c. 1135 – March 30, 1202) was a mystic, a theologian and an esoterist.
He also used the Name IEUE in his diagrams of the trinity.

Source:www.heiligenlexikon.de

Henry VI of England and His Heralds ~1460
Henry VI of England and his heralds used this heraldic arms attributed to St. Michael (the archangel). The heraldic arms has IEUE at the centre. In subsequent centuries the word IEUE was replaced with Deus. It was a type of diagram called the Shield of the Trinity.

Source: Wikipedia Image: Arms-of-St-Michael

Conspiracies Against the Name IEUE

The Massoritic Machinators
The Massorites were amongst those who believed that saying the Name of ALEIM is a sin. They superimposed the man-made law of not ever saying the Name, except perhaps on the Day of Atonement (for undue fear of saying it wrongly), over the eternal-life-giving command to "call" on the Name regularly with reverence. In some twisted way they thought if they can't change the written law (much), then they could at least change the verbal sound of the Hebrew language – by writing in a system of points.
They also used square script Hebrew ("Jewish or Modern Hebrew) instead of paleo Hebrew and ancient Hebrew. It is likely they knew about the two latter alphabets but chose not to use them. (Paleo Hebrew is different to Ancient Hebrew, and both are different to modern Hebrew). This further degraded the value of ancient Hebrew.
"AH" in YAHweh from AH-donai
The Massorites - many of them Gnostics - superimposed the "Yah" sound from their pagan god "IAO" (YAH-O) onto the first half of IEUE's Name by - conveniently for them - superimposing the the "AH" sound of "Adonai" onto the tetragrammaton using vowel points. "A-do-nay" rhymes with "Yah-o-way" Elohim was another word they tried to substitute for the name IEUE.
"Bruce M. Metzger writes: …To the four consonants YHWH of the Name, which had come to be regarded as too sacred to be pronounced, they attached the vowel signs indicating that in its place should be read the Hebrew word Adonai meaning ‘Lord’ (or Elohim meaning ‘God’)...
...The most decisive argument for the replacement of the Tetragrammaton by the alternative Adonai stems from the double expression Adonai and the Tetragrammaton...(...see for instance Amos 7:1; 8:1, etc.). In case of these double expressions, the vowels of the Qere are not the vowels of Adonai, but of Elohim, turning the double expression into Adonai Elohim instead of Adonai Adonai. According to some scholars, the Masoretes wanted to avoid the repetition of Adonai after the title Adonai, thus avoid the reading Adonai Adonai. They instead filled out the vowels of the Tetragrammaton with the vowels of the word Elohim, creating the reading Adonai Elohim instead of Adonai Adonai. This accordingly proves that the Tetragrammaton was normally read as Adonai."
http://www.lectio.unibe.ch/05_2/troyer_names_of_god.htm
Here is an image that shows how similar the vowel points of the words Adonai and Elohim are to the ones on the tetragrammaton in the Leningrad Hebrew Codex.

The Massoritic scribes despised saying the sacred Name so much that even their replacement names were actually mutilated versions of IEUE's titles. Adonai should be ADUNI and Elohim should be ALEIM).
The Leningrad Massoritic Codex was made by the followers of Rabbinic-Judaism and Gnosticism, not true Jewish Messianism. Even though the Jewish scribes have preserved the letters of Hebrew words fairly well, scripture says itself that some IEUEDIM scribes have conspired to make us forget IEUE's name. Jer 8:8 “How do you say, ‘We are wise, and the Torah of יהוה is with us’? But look, the false pen of the scribe has worked falsehood. Jer 23:26 Till when is it in the heart of the prophets? The prophets of falsehood, Yea, prophets of the deceit of their heart, Jer 23:27 Who are devising to cause My people To forget My name by their dreams, That they recount each to his neighbor, As their fathers forgot my name for Baal.
There was no need for the points because the ancient Hebrews knew that the vowel between all consonants is a default "a" ("a" is the most common vowel point between (true) consonants anyway - for example SHaBaT, HaLaL, etc). Ancient Hebrew had vowel-letters (AL, EA, ID, OIN, UU - aleph, heh, yod, ayin, vav - equivalent to the English A-E-I-O-U). The ancient Hebrews were a THRIFTY BUNCH and knew that all (true) consonants had to have a vowel in between (it is impossible to say two consonants together without a vowel in between), and so to SAVE space, and money the ancient Hebrews didn't bother to write the default "a"s in between the consonants. Writing materials were at a PREMIUM in those days, and for ease of carrying around stone slabs in inscriptions - for example the Ten Commandments - they needed a language that was SHORT and CONDENSED. They certainly didn’t need vowel points – that’s why all Ancient Hebrew and Paleo Hebrew inscriptions HAVE NO vowel points. Even early (100 – 900 AD) modern Hebrew bible texts have NO vowel points.
In addition vowel points are a ludicrously complex system. No adult in their right mind would find them easy to memorise, let alone a child. Ancient Hebrew with its picture-letters on the other hand is SO easy to remember - much more than English even. The original language of Earth was a beautiful masterpiece of artwork. Every word paints a very real and concrete picture in the mind of its user.
Jot and Tittle Were NOT Vowel Points
The jot and tittle that IEUESHUO referred to were not vowel-pointings. The jot was the smallest letter in the Estrangelo Aramaic alphabet that He used, and the tittle was a stroke that made up a letter itself...Continue
Double Think
If the second and fourth letters are the same it defies logic to turn the second letter into different vowel sound (ah). This is what the Massorites have done by giving the sacred Name the same vowel-pointings as Adonai.
This is just the beginning of the corruption in the modern Hebrew. There are 21 other letters that have also been disfigured.
Evil Exiles
Earlier in about 2500 BC in Babylon, another group of elite conspiring scribes in the House of IEUEDE (Judah) started to mutilate King DUD's (David's) Paleo Hebrew into a squarer alphabet (Elephantine Aramaic). This new alphabet was inspired by celestial star maps. These scribes worshiped the stars, and held firmly to the same law of the Massorites: the law of anti-pronunciation. This law was almost certainly actually hatched in Babylon.
Contrary to what many believe, these scribes loved being in Babylon and were quite comfortable in their new home. They had lusted after the Babylonians and Chaldeans for many years before their exile, which is why IEUE removed them from the Land of ISHaRaAL and "gave them over to her lovers".
Elephantine Hebrew then evolved into Nabataean Aramaic, which evolved into Palmyrenean Aramaic, which evolved into Qumran Hebrew, which evolved finally into Modern (Jewish/Square-Script) Hebrew.
This makes the modern Hebrew alphabet no more "holy" than English or Greek. In fact, its resemblance to ancient Hebrew is barely visible. The English and Greek alphabets are much more similar to the ancient Hebrew. They even have several letters that are a dead match for the ancient Hebrew. Modern Hebrew hardly has one.
Yah the Pagan God
There have been many pagan gods with the sound "YAH" in them over at least the last 5000 years. These gods are almost certainly related since the same "bloodlines" have been promoting them.
Sumerian IA (YAH)
1000 years before IEUEXaP (Joseph) was in Egypt (around 3000 BCE - NaH's (Noah's) time) ancient Sumerians worshipped IA (Ee-Yah)/EA (Ee-Yah) the fish god (aka Enki), who was the god of water, semen, and satanic craftiness.

Some backslidden Hebrews worshipped this Sumerian god IA (Yah). This is evident from pagan Cuneiform tablets found in the Syrian town of Ebla. This NOT evidence for the tetragrammaton being in use pre-Moses (see below for more). Sumer is where some Hebrews first started to get a taste for Mystery Babylon. Later IEUE handed them over the IEUEDIM to their lovers during the Jewish exile to Babylon, where they rekindled their love for IA (EE-YAH), and later over to the Gnostic Romans who loved IAO (YAH-O) when the Romans besieged the city of IRUSHaLIM in 70 AD.
Why The Name IEUE Had NOT Been Fully Revealed Before MaSHE (Moses)
The only reason why the tetragrammaton is written in verses set in the time before the life of MaSHE (Moses) is because overeager scribes have put it there. Exodus 6:3 is not a question. The authors of the Scriptures 98 have ignored basic Hebrew grammar and changed the order of the Hebrew words. More literal versions know their grammar. The verse does not say "And by My Name, יהוה, AND AL-SHaDI was I not known to them?" ABaREM, ITSaHaQ and IOQaB called on the Name AL SHaDI. Context of Exo 6:3 is IEUE reminding MaSHE that IEUE Was WITH MaSHE. Exodus three was perfect time for IEUE to reveal His Name. There was no other incident like the burning bush BEFORE MaSHE. Ancient Hebrew inscriptions from time of slavery Use AL, not IEUE. MaSHE would only have asked for the Name if he needed It. There are no place names with IEUE in them before MasHE. There are hardly ANY people names with IEUE in them before MaSHE. The real reason why backslidden ancient Hebrews used the word IA (YAH) was because SHaTaN has tried to copy IEUE from day one...Continue
IEUEDIM (Jews) Got YAH from Babylonians, Egyptians and Gnostics
"Yâho (Heb.). Fürst shows this to be the same as the Greek Iao. Yâho is an old Semitic and very mystic name of the supreme deity, while Yah (q.v.) is a later abbreviation which, from containing an abstract ideal, became finally applied to, and connected with, a phallic symbol—the lingham of creation. Both Yah and Yâho were Hebrew “mystery names” derived from Iao, but the Chaldeans had a Yâho before the Jews adopted it, and with them, as explained by some Gnostics and Neo-Platonists, it was the highest conceivable deity enthroned above the seven heavens and representing Spiritual Light (Âtman, the universal), whose ray was Nous, standing both for the intelligent Demiurge of the Universe of Matter and the Divine Manas in man, both being Spirit. The true key of this, communicated to the Initiates only, was that the name of IAO was “triliteral and its nature secret ”, as explained by the Hierophants. The Phœnicians too had a supreme deity whose name was triliteral, and its meanings secret, this was also IAO; and Y-ha-ho was a sacred word in the Egyptian mysteries, which signified “the one eternal and concealed deity” in nature and in man; i.e., the “universal Divine Ideation”, and the human Manas, or the higher Ego."
The Theosophical Glossary by H P Blavatsky First Published 1892
Egyptian IAH
The Egyptians adopted the Sumerian IA as their moon god IAH (Ee-Yah) because the moon controls the water on planet Earth.
"The god Iah, whose name means 'moon', first appears in the Late Period (661-332 BC). The moon god was assimilated with Osiris, god of the dead. Perhaps because, in its monthly cycle, the moon appears to renew itself. Iah also seems to have assumed the lunar aspect of Thoth, god of knowledge, writing and calculation; the segments of the moon were used as fractional symbols in writing." British Museum
Philistine Dagon was IA (YAH)
The Philistines called IA Dagon which the scriptures describe in 1 Samuel 5:3,41, and 1 Chronicles 10:10.
Greek Oannes was IA (YAH)

Catholics Wear Fish-Hats for IA (YAH)
The Catholics wear mitres because they also worship Dagon/IA/YAH.

Babylonian EA/IA
"The cult of Ea extended throughout Babylonia and Assyria. We find temples and shrines erected in his honor, e.g. at Nippur, Girsu, Ur, Babylon, Sippar and Nineveh, and the numerous epithets given to him, as well as the various forms under which the god appears, also bear witness to the popularity which he enjoyed from the earliest to the latest period of Babylonian-Assyrian history." http://personalpages.tds.net/~theseeker/Yahweh.htm
Gnostic IAO (YAH-O)
IAO (Yah-o) is the Gnostic god that is at least 2000 years old and is still in use by Gnostics today.
Gnosticism Very Popular at the Time of the MaSHICH
Gnosticism was a very popular Greco-Roman religion during the time just after IEUESHUO the MaSHICH walked the Earth.
"Gnosticism was popular in the Mediterranean and middle eastern regions in the second and third centuries" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism
Old Greek Texts Have IAO (Iota-Alpha-Omega) Instead of Tetragram
Gnosticism was also very popular when early Greek texts of the scriptures were written.
"In…[a]… Old Greek text of the Book of Leviticus, the name of God is written IAO [Iota - alpha - Omega] http://www.lectio.unibe.ch/05_2/troyer_names_of_god.htm
Many Elite Jews Were Gnostics
Many IEUEDIM (Jews) adopted Gnosticism at this time. This is evident from the coins and amulets archaeologists have found that belong to these Jews. See below.

The Many Evil Meanings of IAO (YAH-O)
The Gnostics have several meanings of the word IAO (YAH-O). Here are just a few. First, IAO was based on an ancient trinity that was first invented by the Sumerians. Ever since this trinity has been worshiped by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Philistines, Romans, Gnostics, Catholics, Freemasons, and other modern occultists. The “I” to the Gnostics stood for Isis (aka Innana/Asherah/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Venus/Cybele/Columbia/Britannia) who symbolized the sinful woman, wife and mother Eve. The “A” stands for Apep (aka Apepi/Apophis) the serpent/dragon/reptilian/crocodile ie Shatan, and the “O” stands for Osiris (aka Saturn) the sinful man, husband and father Adam.
Second, IAO stands for "I ALPHA OMEGA". Some how the title of "AL TAU" (aleph-tau/alpha omega) was adopted by the Gnostic Jews as the name of their god. Even though the Greeks had a letter for TAU which had the exact same name and sound as the TAU of ancient Hebrew, the Gnostics decided to ignore this and adopt or invent a new final letter of the Greek alphabet called omega. This new letter was highly likely invented to hide the sacred Name IEUE since this letter was a complete waste of time for the Greeks. This was because they already had the exact same sound "O" in their Greek alphabet - from their letter omicron. This "I ALPHA OMEGA" is typical of the tactics of SHaTaN. It sounds like it has some goodness and credibility but it is really just a twisted concoction, which sadly half the Hebrew world has now adopted as the first half of their Creator's Name.
Thirdly, IAO (iota-alpha-omega) was an anguipede (chicken-snake) god of war. See below. This image is the same as some on the coins/amulets displayed earlier with the blue background.

http://www.answers.com/topic/anguipede

This aguipede is seen on various modern corporate logos, such as Starbucks.

Fourthly, IAOVE, IOVE or IOVI was the god Jupiter/Zeus, whose name was derived from a fusion of IAO and IEUE. IEUE used to be written as IEVE in Latin. V in latin sounds like a U (ooh). Clement of Alexandria (Platonist Gnostic, early Catholic) popularised this spliced name (IAOVE). The Samaritans had adopted the name IAVE from the Romans, and probably initially said it as it was said in Latin as IAUE. By the 16th century however the latin IAVE had become IABE because by this time the Greek letter "B" had a "V" sound.
Finally, today, IAO stands for the Information Awareness Office, an office set up by the Bush Administration which is run by the Illuminati.

"IAO" (YAH-O) is the Gnostic Mantra that Awakens the Sacred Serpent
Today the Gnostics say the sounds "EE-YAH-OH" (IAO) in meditation to awaken the "sacred serpent".
"The mantra IAO is vocalized by breathing separately and prolonging the pronunciation of each of its three vowels; do not pronounce its three letters in one breath. IAO has the power of awakening the sacred serpent." http://www.gnosticteachings.org/the-teachings-of-gnosis/the-gnostic-jesus/5-jesus-in-egypt
"IAO" (YAH-O) is the Mantra Gnostics Say Jesus Used in Sexual Trances
"The mantra IAO was also vocalized by Master Jesus during the trance of sexual magic; he knew how to withdraw in time from the sexual act in order to avoid seminal ejaculation; this is how Jesus awoke all his occult powers." http://www.gnosticteachings.org/the-teachings-of-gnosis/the-gnostic-jesus/5-jesus-in-egypt
Yahweh Promoters Secret Paganists
Since the reformation many of the people who have popularised the "Yahweh" pronunciation, have been secretly worshiping IA/IAH/IAO, while they have posed as Hebrew and/or Torah scribes and "scholars".
Yahweh Comes from IAOVE
A Gnostic Jew called Genebrardus used Clement of Alexandria's IAOVE and turned it into YAHVE. Genebrardus was a devout Gnostic and he deliberately conspired to promote Clement's pagan name for Zeus in order to profane IEUE's name.
It was in 1567 when Genebrardus invented the guess name YAHVE (Cronograph Paris, 1567, ed. Paris 1600, p.79 seq). He borrowed from Clement of Alexandria (Platonist Gnostic, early Catholic) the Greek spelling IAOVE (Zeus) (which was said as IAOUE) which was later known as JOVE (Roman Jupiter) and converted IAOVE to YAHVE adding the Y, H and dropping the O and I. For "acceptance" he went to the Samaritans and borrowed IABE from their Bibles (who actually got their version from Gnostics's "IAVE/IAOVE" anyway). It was after Genebrardus that other Yahwists dropped the letter V from the YAHVE and a double U (UU=W) and final H was added forming YAHWEH.
"The pronounciation Yahweh is indicated by transliterations of the name into Greek in early Christian literature, in the form iaoue (Clement of Alexandria) or iabe (Theodoret; by this time Gk. b had the pronunciation of v)" New Bible Dictionary (1962)
"Scholar Heinisch pointed the weakness of Yahweh as pronunciation of God’s name He admits is based upon Samaritan tradition as given by Theodoret (fifth century) and Clement of Alexandria (Theology of Testament, p.39)."
Talmud Calls IAOists (Yahwists) Heretics
"The Anguipede is a divinity that is often found on magical amulets from the Greco-Roman period…The Anguipede is depicted as a creature with a cock's head and snakes for legs…In the Talmud, people who turned away from Judaism to such cults are referred to as minim - often translated as "heretics" or "apostates"…Such amulets as well as the usage of the name Iao repeatedly in magical papyri, curse tablets, gems, and other amulets, provide evidence of syncretist cults combining elements of Judaism with paganism." http://www.answers.com/topic/anguipede

King James "JAH" from IAOVE
The "JAH" (pronounced as IAH/YAH in old English, and modern Hebrew) in Psalm 68:4 of the King James Authorized version is commonly used by Yahwists to support their theory. However it was very likely simply only written in the KJV because of the Gnostic influence on its authors.
Here is the actual image of the verse (Psa 68:4) from the 1613 KJV. Click to obtain high resolution image.

The "JAH" in this verse is only one of less than an handful of "JAH"s in this bible version. The KJV uses a real mixture of names for IEUE so this version cannot be used on its own to conclusively prove the name IEUE or Yahweh. However, because Gnostic Jews were popularising the name IAOVE at the exact same time the KJV was written, it is most likely that the JAH in the KJV is from the Gnostics, and not from the ancient Hebrew.
Most of the time the KJV uses "LORD", and sometimes "LORD JEHOUAH" (Isa 26:4). The KJV also uses "JEH/JEHO" in other people's names. Prefixes of abut half of the theophoric names (names with the name of a god embedded into them) of ISHaRaALites are expressed as "JEH" (which was said as YEH/IE - The "J" letter had an "I"/"ee"/"Y" sound.) On the other hand the suffixes of the other theophoric names have the letters "JAH".
JEHOUAH Also Inspired by IAOVE
The JEHOUAH was said as IEH-OUAH/YEH-OUAH (and currently said as JEHOVAH) and is another concocted fusion of a number of words. These are the most likely words it was inspired by -
1) JEH said as YEH from Yehweh/IEUE,
2) O from IAO, and/or the Massoritic vowel point from "Adonai"
3) U from IEUE, and finally
4) AH from goodness knows where?
Here is the actual image of the verse (Isa 26:4) from the 1613 KJV. Click to obtain high resolution image.

The authors of the KJV were Catholic-Jesuits or Pre-Jesuit type, who very likely included those from the Gnostic Jewish elite. It is well documented that some educated IEUEDIM (Jews) were working alongside/for the Roman elite. For example, Josephus. He was paid by the Romans to be a historian. A lot of what Josephus wrote is true (he said the tetragrammaton was four vowels), but the point is that the motive of the evil elite is united at the highest levels, no matter what their religion and ancestry. Either they worship IEUE or they don't. The KJV is not a very good translation. In places it uses one English word for up to at least 15 different Greek words.
The JAH/JEHOUAH in the KJV therefore is inspired by GNOSTIC tradition. The KJV came out about the same time Genebrardus was popularising IAOVE - late sixteenth-early seventeenth century. This is NOT a coincidence. This "JAH" just proves that there were elite Gnostics living in England, that's all.
Modern Hebrew Disallows "Yah" as a Prefix
Even the linguistic rules of modern Hebrew disallow the use of 'Yah' as a a prefix in any Name with "yod-heh-vav" at the start. Why would the Creator's Name be any different. Here we see yet another double standard of the Yahwists.
In the Kings James Bible the "Yeh-u" of these names was written as "Jehu" or "Jeho". For example -
1) Jehu
2) Jehoahaz [both kings]
3) Jehoash
4) Jehozabad
5) Jehohanan [John]
6) Jehoida
7) Jehoiachin
8) Jehoiakim
9) Jehojarib
10) Jehucal
11) Jehonadab
12) Jehonathan
13) Jehoseph
14) Jehoaddin, Jehoaddan [female]
15) Jehozadek, J osedech
16) Jehoram
17) Jehosheba [female]
18) Jehoshua [Jesus]
19) Jehoshaphat
For a full analysis of biblical names with "IEU" in them see ISHaRaALites with IEUE in their Names.
Perversion Prophesied
The forbidding of the pronunciation of the Name IEUE by evil scribes is prophesied about in scripture.
IEUE says through IRaMIEUE (Jeremiah) that in the endtime the sovereigns, princes, the priests, prophets and inhabitants of IEUEDE (Judah) who have led many astray (including the scribes) with their false names (or lack thereof of His Name) for Him will be punished.
Jer 8:1 At that time, an affirmation of IEUE, They bring the bones of the kings of IEUEDE, And the bones of its princes, And the bones of the priests, And the bones of the prophets, And the bones of inhabitants of IRUSHaLIM, Out of their graves, Jer 8:2 And have spread them to sun, and to moon, And to all the host of the heavens, that they have loved, And that they have served, And that they have walked after, And that they have sought, And to which they have bowed themselves, They are not gathered, nor buried, They are for dung on the face of the ground.
Jer 8:8 “How do you say, ‘We are wise, and the Torah of יהוה is with us’? But look, the false pen of the scribe has worked falsehood.
These scribes have, along with an entire entourage of IEUEDIM (and other peoples following them) from all walks of life have cleverly devised to cause us to forget the Name IEUE.
Jer 23:26 Till when is it in the heart of the prophets? The prophets of falsehood, Yea, prophets of the deceit of their heart, Jer 23:27 Who are devising to cause My people To forget My name by their dreams, That they recount each to his neighbor, As their fathers forgot my name for Baal.
IEUE commands us not to listen to the false prophets of IRUSHaLIM who walk in falsehood.
Jer 23:16 Thus said יהוה of hosts, “Do not listen to the words of the prophets who prophesy to you, they lead you astray. They speak a vision of their own heart, not from the mouth of יהוה.
Scribes and Calligraphers - The Elite
Scribes and Calligraphers have had a very elite, prestigious and powerful role in society in the past - much moreso than today. It is for this reason they will be punished severely for leading others astray. Jam 3:1 Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, knowing that we shall receive greater judgment...Continue
Commanded to Say the Name
There are many scriptures that tell us to say our Creator's Name out-loud, if we are able. If a person is not able to speak they can write the correct letters for it. If we were never meant to know the Name, or say His Name, IEUE would never have given MaSHE (Moses) a Name in Exodus, or tell us that we can be saved by calling upon His Name.

(5:39) This video provides scriptural support for saying the Sacred Name. It says that the rabbis have been robbing us of the blessing of knowing "God's" personal Name. It uses the pagan names "Yah", "Yahushua" and "Elohim" but nevertheless provides much evidence the Name was meant to be said out loud.
Here are just some verses that tell us to call on and declare IEUE's Name.
Psalm 105:1 Give thanks to יהוה! CALL UPON HIS NAME, Make known His deeds among the peoples.
Exodus 9:16 ...but indeed for this cause I have made you stand: to show you My power, and that MY NAME BE DECLARED throughout all the earth;
AV 1Ki 8:35-36 When heaven is shut up, and there is no rain, because they have sinned against thee; if they pray toward this place, and CONFESS THY NAME thy name, and turn from their sin, when thou afflictest them:Then hear thou in heaven, and forgive the sin of thy servants.
Zch 13:9 And I will bring the third into the fire. And I will refine them as silver is refined. And I will test them as gold is tested. It shall CALL IN MY NAME, and I will answer it. I will say, My people is it. And IT WILL SAY, IEUE is my ALEIM.
Zph 3:9 For then I will turn a pure lip to the peoples, for them all to CALL ON THE NAME IF IEUE, to serve Him with one shoulder-blade.
The Sound of Your Own Name
Who doesn't like the sound of their own name. Would ALEIM (God) be an exception? We were made in His image after all.

The Son's Name is IEUESHUO E MaSHICH

The Son of IEUE's Name was IEUESHUO E MaSHICH. This is a theophoric name. IEUE invented theophoric names. The whole family in heaven and earth is named after IEUE. Hebrew names have a purpose. Western parents are still careful about names. Having a theophoric name did not make IEUESHUO God. IEUE-Names were desecrated in Babylon. IEUESHUO is just another mutilated theophoric name. The elite Greeks and Romans mutilated the Name IEUESHUO even more. IEUESHUO means "IEUE Saves". There were at least two other men called IEUESHUO in scripture. Theophoric names mean that we have to be consistent in what the call the Father and Son. Shortening someone's name in the Hebrew culture was a way to dishonour them. IEUESHUO is pronounced as "Yeh-weh-shwo Eh Mash eech.
Theophoric Names
A person who has the name of a god in his or her name is said to have a theophoric name.
"A theophoric name (Greek: "bearing a deity") embeds the name of a god, both invoking and displaying the protection of that deity. Instances of theophoric names embedding Apollo, will be familiar among the many men named Apollonios or Apollodorus in Greek Antiquity.
Theophoric names were also exceedingly common in the Ancient Near East and Mesopotamia, where the personal name of an individual included the name of a god in whose care the individual is entrusted. The practice, called in onomastics theophory, refers to this naming convention of adding a god's name (or the local equivalent of the generic term for god) to an individual's proper name." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophoric_names
IEUE Invented Theophoric Names
Num 6:27 “Thus THEY SHALL PUT MY NAME ON THE CHILDREN OF ISHaRaAL, and I Myself shall bless them.”
Download IEUE_Names_JEM_2_pdf.pdf for a full analysis of the scriptural remnants of their names.
Whole Family in Heaven and Earth Named After IEUE
Ephesians chapter three says that the whole family in the heavens and on earth is named after the Father.
Eph 3:14 (KJV) For this cause I bow my knees unto the FATHER of our Lord Jesus Christ, Eph 3:15 OF WHOM THE WHOLE FAMILY OF HEAVEN AND EARTH IS NAMED,
The family includes at least the 70 odd ISHaRaALites in scripture and anyone who has been immersed into the Name of IEUESHUO. When we are immersed into the Name of IEUESHUO E MASHICH we take the Father's Name on to us via the Son's Name. IEUE then accepts us in the beloved. 1Ti 2:5 For [there is] one ALEIM, and one mediator between ALEIM and men, the man MASHICH IEUESHUO. When we take on the Son's Name, we take on the Father's character and eternal life - the eternal life that is defined by the letter meanings in the Name IEUE. It is this Name that will protect us during the great three and a half year tribulation that is to come. It is our forehead seal.
Hebrew Names Have a Purpose
Each theophoric name that had "IEUE" in it indicated what IEUE would do through them in their life or the relationship that person would have with IEUE. He put His mark of approval upon them - by putting His Name upon them.
"Throughout the Scriptures, God puts his personal name on certain places, objects or persons. This act implied several things: ownership, adoption, even marriage. It meant that that place or person would (should) demonstrate God's character, or would be a living demonstration of a particular principle that God wanted other human beings to observe. When the "Blessing of Aaron" (Numbers 6:24-26) is spoken over the people, the divine word follows: "So they shall invoke [lit. put] my Name on the children of Israel" (v. 27)." http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/hashem.html
"In the ancient world of the Bible, names had meaning. Some names depicted the wish of parents (or of God) for a child to fulfill a certain destiny. Or a name could describe a child's hoped-for character. Or if in later life he did not live up to his character name, he might be renamed. We have Abram—Abraham; Jacob—Israel; Jedidiah—Solomon." http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/hashem.html
Western Parents Still Careful About Names
Even today in the Western world we are careful what names we call our children.
"The response to a given name is definitely determined by the history of the name-bearer. In May 1945 no child was given the name of Adolf!" http://www.jewsforjesus.org/answers/jesus/names
A Theophoric Name Did Not Make IEUESHUO God
Some people say that the Son had the Father's Name embedded into His name because the Son was the Father in the flesh. However there were almost 70 people in the bible with theophoric names so this idea is highly illogical otherwise we would have 70 MaSHICHs (Messiahs).
Joh 3:16 “For ALEIM so loved the world that He gave His ONLY BROUGHT-FORTH SON
See here for more evidence that IEUESHUO was NOT God.
IEUE-Names Were Desecrated in Babylon
In Babylon an assault was made on the "IEUE"- theophoric names by some evil scribes of IEUEDE (Judah). They hacked and mutilated these names - making up to five shortened versions of each one.
It was forbidden to pronounce "IEUE", "IEU"or even "IE" or "IU". Thus these scribes bought the name of IEUE to naught by telling the Southern Kingdom in exile that the Name IEUE should never be pronounced for "fear of saying it incorrectly".
This fear is scripturally unwarranted. Whilst we are to use the Name IEUE respectfully, we are encouraged to use it frequently (just as any pair of "lovers", or parent to child would). The fact that the tetragrammaton is mentioned at least 6000 times in the "Old Testament" shows that the writers of the original autographs had no problem using the name. Actually it suggests they were flaunting it.
IEUESHUO Just Another Mutilated Theophoric Name
"Yehoshua is formally a theoforic name with the abbreviated tetragrammaton JHWH as its first element." http://www.jewsforjesus.org/answers/jesus/names
The most severe cases of name mutilation are as follows:
Michaiah (MIKIEUE) which has five shortened versions.
Jehizkiah (IHaZaQIEUE) which has four.
Jeconiah (IKUNIEUE) which has four.
Ishmaiah (ISHaMOIEUE) which has four.
and last but not least, Yehoshua (IEUESHUO) which has FOUR.
It is not surprising the the MaSHICH's Name is one of the most butchered since our salvation (through immersion) depends on it.
The longest remnant of the Son's Name in scripture is - IEUSHUO, and is found in the oldest Massoritic Westminster Leningrad Codex writings of scripture including TURE (Torah) in Deuteronomy 3:21 and in Judges 2:7. This indicates that over time His Name got shorter and shorter.
"Throughout the early books of the Hebrew Bible, Joshua's name is spelled Yehoshua. After the Babylonian Exile, the name underwent a shortening, apparently to remove the holy name element (Yeho-) so pagans wouldn't profane it. Thus in the post-exile book Nehemiah, Joshua is called "Yeshua the son of Nun" (Neh 8:17). Here is the progression: Hoshea son of Nun > Yehoshua son of Nun > Yeshua son of Nun. http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/hashem.html
"I dare not claim that the long form cannot have been in use as a personal name in New Testament times. In the case of names, never say never."http://www.jewsforjesus.org/answers/jesus/names
Further Mutilation of "IEUESHUO" by Elite Greeks and Romans
"In the Greek Bible (the Septuagint, LXX), Yehoshua and Yeshua are both represented by one name: Yesous.
IEUESHUO Means "IEUE Saves"
The Name of the MaSHICH (IEUESHUO) was a perfect example of a purposeful Name. His Name means “IEUE Saves". IEUE was to save the world through His Son.
Mt 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his Name IEUESHUO: for he shall save his [IEUE’s] people from their sins.
In pictographic (ancient) Hebrew IEUESHUO means "IEUE sharply secures, watches and shades". To sharply secure, watch and shade in ancient Hebrew meant to save.

At Least Two Other IEUESHUOs
We know the Son of IEUE had the same name as IEUESHUO Son of NUN (Joshua) since the Greek New Testament uses the same name for Joshua Son of Nun and Jesus (Acts 7:45; Heb 4:8).
"Joshua, Moses' lieutenant and successor, was originally not named Joshua. Numbers 13:16 records: "Moses called Hoshea the son of Nun, Joshua." Grammatically, "Hoshea" seems to mean "Help! Save!" [Hifil, infinitive absolute, command form of yasha]. In contrast, "Joshua" in Hebrew is "Yehoshua" and means "YHVH, the LORD, helps or saves."The name change focused attention on the Source of help. Through Yehoshua, YHVH would rescue his people. (In the Apocrypha, teachers recognized the symbolism of his name: "Joshua . . . according to his name was made great for the saving of the elect of God"; Sirach 46:1). http://www.hebrew-streams.org/works/hebrew/hashem.html
Also we also know that the Son's is a "branch". Scripture tells us that another, lesser known Pre-Messianic biblical person also called IEUESHUO has a name called "branch". He was the son of IEUETSaDaQ (Josedech) the high priest who served under King ZaRaBaBaL (Zerrubabel) Later this IEUESHUO became high priest also, and built ZaRaBaBaL's temple.
Jer 23:5 “See, the days are coming,” declares יהוה, “when I shall raise for DUD [David] a Branch [1] of righteousness, and a Sovereign shall reign and act wisely, and shall do right-ruling and righteousness in the earth. Footnote: 1 Or sprout.
Hag 1:12 Then ZaRaBaBaL son of SHaLaTIAL (She’alti’ĕl), and IEUESHUO (Yehoshua) son of IEUETSaDaQ (Yehotsaḏaq), the high priest, with all the remnant of the people, obeyed the voice of יהוה their ALEIM, and the words of ḤaGI (Haggai) the prophet, as יהוה their ALEIM had sent him. And the people feared the presence of יהוה.
Zch 6:11-12 And you take silver and gold and make crowns and place them on the head of IEUESHUO, son of IEUETSaDaQ, the great priest. And you speak to him, saying, Thus speaks IEUE of hosts, saying: Behold the man! Sprout is his name. And from under him shall it sprout. And he shall build the temple of IEUE.
Being Consistent
With this in mind it's not possible to worship “Yahweh” and to love His Son “Yeshua”. We should either use Yahweh and Yah-u-shua or Yehweh and Yeh-weh-shuo. We should either use all “a’s or all “e’s.The Son came in the Father’s Name literally - His Name had the Father’s in it. Otherwise we cannot call the Father our Saviour.
Shortened Name - Less Honour
It's a Hebrew custom to shorten someone's name to dishonouring a person. The name Yeshua, whilst still maintaining a large percentage of correct pronunciation still falls short of the required number of letters - that give esteem to both the Father and the Son.
The name Yeshu (which transliterates to ISHU in ancient Hebrew and English) is even shorter, and the disdain that this name carries in modern Israel is testament to this. The longest form of the Son's Name (Yehoshua) is a common name used in modern Israel today. This implies that the longest version (IEUESHUO) is the most approved.
As mentioned earlier both ABaRaM (Abram) and SHaRI (Sarai) both had the letter named EA, said as "Eh" ADDED to their names to HONOUR them. The name ABaRaM (H87) turned into ABaREM (H85) and the name SHaRI (H8297) turned into SHaRE (H8283).
How to Pronounce IEUESHUO
I said as "ee" - Id in ancient Hebrew (Yod in modern)
E said as "eh" - Ea (Heh)
U said as "oo" - Uu (Vav)
E said as "eh" - Ea (Heh)
SH said as "sh" - Shan (Shin)
U said as "oo" - Uu (Vav)
O sais as "oh" - Oin (Ayin)
Again, there are many vowels in the Son's Name. This was deliberately established by IEUE to reduce the to possible number of combinations that people could contort out of His Name.
For "E MaSHICH" ("the messiah") we can apply the same rule of equivalence and rule of the "default "a"" (not a Masoretic vowel pointing) between two (true) consonants in order to correctly pronounce His Name.
E said as "eh" - Ea in ancient Hebrew (Heh in modern)
M said as "mah" - MA (Mem)
SH said as "sh" - SHaN (Shin)
I said as "ee" - EA (Heh)
H said as "ch/hh/kh" - HhaTS (Chet)
For a quick tutorial on how the Creator and His Son's Name should be pronounced click here.

Does "God's" Name Matter?

Knowing IEUE's Name is crucial since our salvation depends on it. We can only obtain eternal life once we call on His Name in immersion and prayer, and keep His commandments. Then if we're counted worthy and are still alive, we can physically escape from the Great Tribulation to Jordan and Negev - the only place of safety.
Joe 2:32 “And it shall be that everyone who calls on the Name of יהוה shall be delivered. For on Mount TSIUN and in IRUSHaLIM there shall be an escape as יהוה has said, and among the survivors whom יהוה calls.
The Name is the Seal
Coming Soon
The Name is the Virgins' Oil
The Name IEUE is also the five wise virgins' oil. It fuels them throughout the Great Tribulation, and for eternity. It helps show them where to meet their Bridegroom. It's essential to their eternal and physical life, just like olive oil has been essential to physical life for thousands of years in the Near East. The five wise virgins are the 144 000. The five foolish virgins are the great multitude of Revelation. Son 1:3 MKJV "Your name is as oil poured out; therefore the virgins love You."...Continue

(5:42) Although this video erroneously uses "YHWH" instead of IEUE it nevertheless gives us a beautiful idea on what makes the five virgins wiser than the other five.
Only 144 000 Sealed
There may be only 144 000 people, dead or alive, who obtain eternal (and possibly physical) deliverance by the blood of the Lamb, between His resurrection, ca 30 AD, and the start of the Great Tribulation. These people have the Seal of the Father's Name IEUE on their foreheads. The Great Tribulation will not start until the sealing of this group is complete. Rev 7:3-4 “Do not harm the earth, nor the sea, nor the trees until we have sealed the servants of our ALEIM upon their foreheads.” And I heard the number of those who were sealed, one hundred and forty-four thousand, sealed out of all the tribes of the children of ISHaRaAL...Continue
The 144 000 Include Females
The 144 000 include both males and females. "Men" in Rev 14:4 means "Mankind". The 144000 maidens are symbolic. Evil females will be punished so good females will be rewarded. Females were rescued in the Babylonian attack on Jerusalem 2500 years ago. IEUEAL (Joel) stated that while IEUE's people would be calling His Name, He would pour His Spirit out on all flesh. The 120 in the Upper Room included women. The 120 were the first to count towards the 144 000. Females were included in the Great Flood rescue count. Rescuing only men or women in the Great Tribulation is anti-family...Continue

Can We Know The Sacred Names Now?
In order for a pre-Tribulation deliverance of ALEIM's people, His Name (including its correct pronunciation) must be made known to them. This means that they will be able to know His Name in this age, despite what jaded Sacred-Name hunters may say. Isa 52:6 “Therefore My people shall know My Name, in that day, for I am the One who is speaking. See, it is I.”...Continue
IEUE not YHWH - The Book
The book IEUE not YHWH by J E Marchant (coming soon) will summarise all of her research on YehSpace, plus much more. In the meantime, feel free to browse this large page, or sign up, if you'd like more detail (and great fellowship!).

I encourage you to investigate the links offered in this article. Truth is that precious jewel.

Ben IEUE

There have been many pagan gods with the sound "YAH" in them over at least the last 5000 years. These gods are almost certainly related since the same "bloodlines" have been promoting them.
Sumerian IA (YAH)
1000 years before IEUEXaP (Joseph) was in Egypt (around 3000 BCE - NaH's (Noah's) time) ancient Sumerians worshipped IA (Ee-Yah)/EA (Ee-Yah) the fish god (aka Enki), who was the god of water, semen, and satanic craftiness.

Some backslidden Hebrews worshipped this Sumerian god IA (Yah). This is evident from pagan Cuneiform tablets found in the Syrian town of Ebla. This NOT evidence for the tetragrammaton being in use pre-Moses (see below for more). Sumer is where some Hebrews first started to get a taste for Mystery Babylon. Later IEUE handed them over the IEUEDIM to their lovers during the Jewish exile to Babylon, where they rekindled their love for IA (EE-YAH), and later over to the Gnostic Romans who loved IAO (YAH-O) when the Romans besieged the city of IRUSHaLIM in 70 AD.

Why The Name IEUE Had NOT Been Fully Revealed Before MaSHE (Moses)
The only reason why the tetragrammaton is written in verses set in the time before the life of MaSHE (Moses) is because overeager scribes have put it there. Exodus 6:3 is not a question. The authors of the Scriptures 98 have ignored basic Hebrew grammar and changed the order of the Hebrew words. More literal versions know their grammar. The verse does not say "And by My Name, יהוה, AND AL-SHaDI was I not known to them?" ABaREM, ITSaHaQ and IOQaB called on the Name AL SHaDI. Context of Exo 6:3 is IEUE reminding MaSHE that IEUE Was WITH MaSHE. Exodus three was perfect time for IEUE to reveal His Name. There was no other incident like the burning bush BEFORE MaSHE. Ancient Hebrew inscriptions from time of slavery Use AL, not IEUE. MaSHE would only have asked for the Name if he needed It. There are no place names with IEUE in them before MasHE. There are hardly ANY people names with IEUE in them before MaSHE. The real reason why backslidden ancient Hebrews used the word IA (YAH) was because SHaTaN has tried to copy IEUE from day one...Continue

IEUEDIM (Jews) Got YAH from Babylonians, Egyptians and Gnostics
"Yâho (Heb.). Fürst shows this to be the same as the Greek Iao. Yâho is an old Semitic and very mystic name of the supreme deity, while Yah (q.v.) is a later abbreviation which, from containing an abstract ideal, became finally applied to, and connected with, a phallic symbol—the lingham of creation. Both Yah and Yâho were Hebrew “mystery names” derived from Iao, but the Chaldeans had a Yâho before the Jews adopted it, and with them, as explained by some Gnostics and Neo-Platonists, it was the highest conceivable deity enthroned above the seven heavens and representing Spiritual Light (Âtman, the universal), whose ray was Nous, standing both for the intelligent Demiurge of the Universe of Matter and the Divine Manas in man, both being Spirit. The true key of this, communicated to the Initiates only, was that the name of IAO was “triliteral and its nature secret ”, as explained by the Hierophants. The Phœnicians too had a supreme deity whose name was triliteral, and its meanings secret, this was also IAO; and Y-ha-ho was a sacred word in the Egyptian mysteries, which signified “the one eternal and concealed deity” in nature and in man; i.e., the “universal Divine Ideation”, and the human Manas, or the higher Ego."
The Theosophical Glossary by H P Blavatsky First Published 1892

Egyptian IAH
The Egyptians adopted the Sumerian IA as their moon god IAH (Ee-Yah) because the moon controls the water on planet Earth.
"The god Iah, whose name means 'moon', first appears in the Late Period (661-332 BC). The moon god was assimilated with Osiris, god of the dead. Perhaps because, in its monthly cycle, the moon appears to renew itself. Iah also seems to have assumed the lunar aspect of Thoth, god of knowledge, writing and calculation; the segments of the moon were used as fractional symbols in writing." British Museum
Philistine Dagon was IA (YAH)
The Philistines called IA Dagon which the scriptures describe in 1 Samuel 5:3,41, and 1 Chronicles 10:10.
Greek Oannes was IA (YAH)

Catholics Wear Fish-Hats for IA (YAH)
The Catholics wear mitres because they also worship Dagon/IA/YAH.

Babylonian EA/IA
"The cult of Ea extended throughout Babylonia and Assyria. We find temples and shrines erected in his honor, e.g. at Nippur, Girsu, Ur, Babylon, Sippar and Nineveh, and the numerous epithets given to him, as well as the various forms under which the god appears, also bear witness to the popularity which he enjoyed from the earliest to the latest period of Babylonian-Assyrian history." http://personalpages.tds.net/~theseeker/Yahweh.htm
Gnostic IAO (YAH-O)
IAO (Yah-o) is the Gnostic god that is at least 2000 years old and is still in use by Gnostics today.
Gnosticism Very Popular at the Time of the MaSHICH
Gnosticism was a very popular Greco-Roman religion during the time just after IEUESHUO the MaSHICH walked the Earth.
"Gnosticism was popular in the Mediterranean and middle eastern regions in the second and third centuries" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism
Old Greek Texts Have IAO (Iota-Alpha-Omega) Instead of Tetragram
Gnosticism was also very popular when early Greek texts of the scriptures were written.
"In…[a]… Old Greek text of the Book of Leviticus, the name of God is written IAO [Iota - alpha - Omega] http://www.lectio.unibe.ch/05_2/troyer_names_of_god.htm
Many Elite Jews Were Gnostics
Many IEUEDIM (Jews) adopted Gnosticism at this time. This is evident from the coins and amulets archaeologists have found that belong to these Jews. See below. Click to enlarge.

The Many Evil Meanings of IAO (YAH-O)
The Gnostics have several meanings of the word IAO (YAH-O). Here are just a few. First, IAO was based on an ancient trinity that was first invented by the Sumerians. Ever since this trinity has been worshiped by the Assyrians, Babylonians, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Philistines, Romans, Gnostics, Catholics, Freemasons, and other modern occultists. The “I” to the Gnostics stood for Isis (aka Innana/Asherah/Ishtar/Aphrodite/Venus/Cybele/Columbia/Britannia) who symbolized the sinful woman, wife and mother Eve. The “A” stands for Apep (aka Apepi/Apophis) the serpent/dragon/reptilian/crocodile ie Shatan, and the “O” stands for Osiris (aka Saturn) the sinful man, husband and father Adam.
Second, IAO stands for "I ALPHA OMEGA". Some how the title of "AL TAU" (aleph-tau/alpha omega) was adopted by the Gnostic Jews as the name of their god. Even though the Greeks had a letter for TAU which had the exact same name and sound as the TAU of ancient Hebrew, the Gnostics decided to ignore this and adopt or invent a new final letter of the Greek alphabet called omega. This new letter was highly likely invented to hide the sacred Name IEUE since this letter was a complete waste of time for the Greeks. This was because they already had the exact same sound "O" in their Greek alphabet - from their letter omicron. This "I ALPHA OMEGA" is typical of the tactics of SHaTaN. It sounds like it has some goodness and credibility but it is really just a twisted concoction, which sadly half the Hebrew world has now adopted as the first half of their Creator's Name.
Thirdly, IAO (iota-alpha-omega) was an anguipede (chicken-snake) god of war. See below. This image is the same as some on the coins/amulets displayed earlier with the blue background.

http://www.answers.com/topic/anguipede

This aguipede is seen on various modern corporate logos, such as Starbucks.

Fourthly, IAOVE, IOVE or IOVI was the god Jupiter/Zeus, whose name was derived from a fusion of IAO and IEUE. IEUE used to be written as IEVE in Latin. V in latin sounds like a U (ooh). Clement of Alexandria (Platonist Gnostic, early Catholic) popularised this spliced name (IAOVE). The Samaritans had adopted the name IAVE from the Romans, and probably initially said it as it was said in Latin as IAUE. By the 16th century however the latin IAVE had become IABE because by this time the Greek letter "B" had a "V" sound.
Finally, today, IAO stands for the Information Awareness Office, an office set up by the Bush Administration which is run by the Illuminati.

"IAO" (YAH-O) is the Gnostic Mantra that Awakens the Sacred Serpent
Today the Gnostics say the sounds "EE-YAH-OH" (IAO) in meditation to awaken the "sacred serpent".
"The mantra IAO is vocalized by breathing separately and prolonging the pronunciation of each of its three vowels; do not pronounce its three letters in one breath. IAO has the power of awakening the sacred serpent." http://www.gnosticteachings.org/the-teachings-of-gnosis/the-gnostic...
"IAO" (YAH-O) is the Mantra Gnostics Say Jesus Used in Sexual Trances
"The mantra IAO was also vocalized by Master Jesus during the trance of sexual magic; he knew how to withdraw in time from the sexual act in order to avoid seminal ejaculation; this is how Jesus awoke all his occult powers." http://www.gnosticteachings.org/the-teachings-of-gnosis/the-gnostic...
Yahweh Promoters Secret Paganists
Since the reformation many of the people who have popularised the "Yahweh" pronunciation, have been secretly worshiping IA/IAH/IAO, while they have posed as Hebrew and/or Torah scribes and "scholars".
Yahweh Comes from IAOVE
A Gnostic Jew called Genebrardus used Clement of Alexandria's IAOVE and turned it into YAHVE. Genebrardus was a devout Gnostic and he deliberately conspired to promote Clement's pagan name for Zeus in order to profane IEUE's name.
It was in 1567 when Genebrardus invented the guess name YAHVE (Cronograph Paris, 1567, ed. Paris 1600, p.79 seq). He borrowed from Clement of Alexandria (Platonist Gnostic, early Catholic) the Greek spelling IAOVE (Zeus) (which was said as IAOUE) which was later known as JOVE (Roman Jupiter) and converted IAOVE to YAHVE adding the Y, H and dropping the O and I. For "acceptance" he went to the Samaritans and borrowed IABE from their Bibles (who actually got their version from Gnostics's "IAVE/IAOVE" anyway). It was after Genebrardus that other Yahwists dropped the letter V from the YAHVE and a double U (UU=W) and final H was added forming YAHWEH.
"The pronounciation Yahweh is indicated by transliterations of the name into Greek in early Christian literature, in the form iaoue (Clement of Alexandria) or iabe (Theodoret; by this time Gk. b had the pronunciation of v)" New Bible Dictionary (1962)
"Scholar Heinisch pointed the weakness of Yahweh as pronunciation of God’s name He admits is based upon Samaritan tradition as given by Theodoret (fifth century) and Clement of Alexandria (Theology of Testament, p.39)."
Even the Talmud Calls IAOists (Yahwists) Heretics
"The Anguipede is a divinity that is often found on magical amulets from the Greco-Roman period…The Anguipede is depicted as a creature with a cock's head and snakes for legs…In the Talmud, people who turned away from Judaism to such cults are referred to as minim - often translated as "heretics" or "apostates"…Such amulets as well as the usage of the name Iao repeatedly in magical papyri, curse tablets, gems, and other amulets, provide evidence of syncretist cults combining elements of Judaism with paganism." http://www.answers.com/topic/anguipede
King James "JAH" from IAOVE
The "JAH" (pronunced as IAH/YAH in old English, and modern Hebrew) in Psalm 68:4 of the King James Authorised version is commonly used by Yahwists to support their theory. However it was very likely simply only written in the KJV because of the Gnostic influence on its authors.
Here is the actual image of the verse (Psa 68:4) from the 1613 KJV. Click to obtain high resolution image.

The "JAH" in this verse is only one of less than an handful of "JAH"s in this bible version. The KJV uses a real mixture of names for IEUE so this version cannot be used on its own to conclusively prove the name IEUE or Yahweh. However, because Gnostic Jews were popularising the name IAOVE at the exact same time the KJV was written, it is most likely that the JAH in the KJV is from the Gnostics, and not from the ancient Hebrew.
Most of the time the KJV uses "LORD", and sometimes "LORD JEHOUAH" (Isa 26:4). The KJV also uses "JEH/JEHO" in other people's names. Prefixes of abut half of the theophoric names (names with the name of a god embedded into them) of ISHaRaALites are expressed as "JEH" (which was said as YEH/IE - The "J" letter had an "I"/"ee"/"Y" sound.) On the other hand the suffixes of the other theophoric names have the letters "JAH".
JEHOUAH Also Inspired by IAOVE
The JEHOUAH was said as IEH-OUAH/YEH-OUAH (and currently said as JEHOVAH) and is another concocted fusion of a number of words. These are the most likely words it was inspired by -
1) JEH said as YEH from Yehweh/IEUE,
2) O from IAO
3) U from IEUE, and finally
4) AH from goodness knows where?
Here is the actual image of the verse (Isa 26:4) from the 1613 KJV. Click to obtain high resolution image.

The authors of the KJV were Catholic-Jesuits or Pre-Jesuit type, who very likely included those from the Gnostic Jewish elite. It is well documented that some educated IEUEDIM (Jews) were working alongside/for the Roman elite. For example, Josephus. He was paid by the Romans to be a historian. A lot of what Josephus wrote is true (he said the tetragrammaton was four vowels), but the point is that the motive of the evil elite is united at the highest levels, no matter what their religion and ancestry. Either they worship IEUE or they don't. The KJV is not a very good translation. In places it uses one English word for up to at least 15 different Greek words.
The JAH/JEHOUAH in the KJV therefore is inspired by GNOSTIC tradition. The KJV came out about the same time Genebrardus was popularising IAOVE - late sixteenth-early seventeenth century. This is NOT a coincidence. This "JAH" just proves that there were elite Gnostics living in England, that's all.
Conclusion
The sound YAH is extremely dodgy

Meaning of "Day of Trumpets" in Ancient Hebrew
by J E Marchant ©2008
The "Day of Trumpets" should actually be called the "Day of Blasting".

This is because in ancient Hebrew the phrase for the "Day of Trumpets" is "IUM (day) TaRUOE". TaRUOE means the "first sign to secure, watch and lookout", ie an initial indication or alarm that was given to groups of people to secure, watch over and look-out for their family and property, in the case of an emergency, war, or a set-apart time of rejoicing. In ancient times the alarm was made by blasting a trumpet and/or a human voice. In the Book of Revelation the alarm might also be made using thunder, earthquakes, and great icy and fiery hail.

People Can TaRUOE (Blast) Too. The main reason why we celebrate the Day of Blasting is to envision the FUTURE event when we (prayerfully) will obtain new bodies as we shout IEUE's Name, and when IEUE's period of final warning of the inhabitants of the Earth will commence.

The Day of Blasting
We are commanded to blast on the first day of the seventh month.
CLV Lv 23:24 Speak to the sons of Israel, saying, In the seventh month on day one of the month there shall be a cessation for you with a memorial trumpet blasting, a holy meeting.
CLV Num 29:1 In the seventh month, on day one of the month you shall come to have a holy meeting when you shall do no occupational work at all; a day of trumpet blast shall you come to have.

Trumpets not Specified, but Were Usually Used to Blast
These verses (above) do not actually contain the word "trumpet". However we know from many events in scripTURE that ancient Hebrews certainly used trumpets/bugles/horns which they called SHaPURs (shofars) to make blasting noises for emergencies, battle starts and times of rejoicing. This is the reason why most bible versions have inserted the word "trumpet".

Ancient Hebrew "TaRUOE" Means "Blast"
The ancient Hebrew word for blasting/blast in the above verses is "TaRUOE" (said as "ta-roo-oh-eh"). This word has five letters. The lower case "a" is just a default vowel for connecting two consonants, and is not based on Massoritic vowel points.

The five letters are
T = tau (modern tav) = two crossed sticks. This represents a sign.
R = raash (modern resh) = man's head. This represents first
U = uu (modern vav) = tent peg. This represents secure
O = oin (modern ayin) = eye. This represents watch
E = ea (modern heh) = man with arms raised. This represents look

Overall we get "Sign (that is) first (for) securing, watching and looking", or "the first sign to secure, watch and lookout". In other words an initial indication or alarm that was given to groups of people to secure, watch over and look-out for their family and property, in the case of an emergency, war, or a set-apart time of rejoicing (usually because of the victory over an enemy).

Concordance and Lexicon Definitions
Strong's Concordance and Benner's Ancient Hebrew Lexicon say that TaRUOE means an alarm, loud noise, shout, a cry. This aligns with the ancient Hebrew pictographic analysis of each of the letters of the word.

Strong's definition of "TaRUOE (teruah)" (H8643)תּרוּעה 

From H7321; clamor, that is, acclamation of joy or a battle cry; especially clangor of trumpets, as an alarum: - alarm, blow (-ing) (of, the) (trumpets), joy, jubile, loud noise, rejoicing, shout (-ing), (high, joyful) sound (-ing).

Strong's definition of "RUO (rua)" (H7321)
רוּע
A primitive root; to mar (especially by breaking); figuratively to split the ears (with sound), that is, shout (for alarm or joy): - blow an alarm, cry (alarm, aloud, out), destroy, make a joyful noise, smart, shout (for joy), sound an alarm, triumph.

Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible Definition of TaRUOE (AHLB#:1460-J (i1))
Shout: A great shout of alarm, war or rejoicing. [freq. 36] |kjv: shout, shouting, alarm, sound, blowing, joy| {str: 8643}

Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible Definition of RUO (AHLB#:1460-J (V))
Shout: To shout an alarm, war or great rejoicing. [freq. 46] (vf: Niphal, Hiphil) |kjv: shout, noise, alarm, cry, triumph, smart| {str: 7321}

People Can TaRUOE (Blast) Too
The word TaRUOE is not just used for the blast of a trumpet. It can be used for describing the shout of a person.
For example -
1) When the ISHaRaALites encircled IRIHU (Jericho). They were commanded to not just blow their SHaPURs but also shout (TaRUOE) with their voices.
"Teruah literally means to make a loud noise. This word can describe the noise made by a trumpet but it also describes the noise made by a large gathering of people shouting in unison (Nu 10:5–6)."http://www.karaite-korner.org/yom_teruah.shtml Emphasis added.

CLV Jsh 6:5
and it has been, in the prolongation of the horn of the jubilee, in your hearing the voice of the trumpet, all the people shout--a great shout [TaROUE], and the wall of the city has fallen under it, and the people have gone up, each over-against him.'

CLV Jsh 6:20 And the people shout, AND blow with the trumpets, and it comes to pass when the people hear the voice of the trumpet, that the people shout--a great shout [TaROUE], and the wall falls under it, and the people goes up into the city, each over-against him, and they capture the city;

2) When the ISHaRaALites took the Ark of the Covenant from the Philistine camp back to the Hebrew camp. It doesn't say exactly what ISHaRaAL shouted with, but it does say "ISHaRaAL shouted". ISHaRaAL are people.

1Sa 4:5 And when the ark of the covenant of יהוה came into the camp, all ISHaRaAL shouted [TaRUOE] so loudly that the earth shook. 1Sa 4:6 And when the Philistines heard the noise of the shout [TaRUOE], they said, “What is the noise of this great shout [TaRUOE] in the camp of the Heḇrews?” And when they knew that the ark of יהוה had come into the camp,

3) When the ISHaRaALites carried the Ark into the city of IRUSHaLIM. Both humans shouted [TaRUOE] with their voices AND the ram's horn was "sounded".

The word for "sounded" used is QUL, which means "voice" (not blast), and comes from the letters "qap-uu-lam" which mean "authoritative securing at the horizon", in other words the call of the shepherd to the sheep at sunset, which by extension means "call". (Note the similarity in the English word "call" and the ancient Hebrew word "QUL"! This is not a co-incidence, please see English Alphabet Shaped by Hebrews Only for the explanation why).

Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible Definition of QUL (AHLB#: 1426-J (N))
Voice The call of the shepherd to the sheep who knew him by sound. When it came time to move he would call them and they would quickly gather to him, the sound of the shepherd, musical instrument, the wind, thunder, etc.

2Sa 6:15 Thus DUD (David) and all the house of ISHaRaAL brought up the ark of יהוה with shouting [TaRUOE] AND with the sound [QUL]of the ram’s horn.
4) When the altar was rebuilt in IRUSHaLIM. The people of ISHaRaAL praised IEUE as they shouted [TaRUOE].

Ezr 3:11 And they responded by praising and giving thanks to יהוה, “For He is good, for His kindness towards ISHaRaAL is forever.” And all the people shouted with a great shout [TaRUOE], when they praised יהוה, because the foundation of the House of יהוה was laid.
5) IUB (Job's) friend BaLaDaD (Bildad) told him that lips can blast [TaRUOE].
YLT Jb 8:21 While he filleth with laughter thy mouth, And thy lips with shouting [TaRUOE],
There are more references to humans "blasting" in Psa 27:6, Psa 33:3, and Psa 89:15.

More than Just a Rest Day with "Blasting"
TURE (Torah) may be fairly quiet on what this IUM (day) means, but the New Covenant scriptures are very clear what this day represents.

IUM TaRUOE is not so much a day of remembering the past, this is probably why the TURE is fairly quiet on the matter. The Autumnal feasts are types of FUTURE events, and so this means IUM TaRUOE's meaning is futuristic, because IUM TaRUOE is an autumnal High SHaBaT.
One day in the future the Son of ADaM (IEUESHUO) will gather His chosen ones from the whole Earth with the "great sound of a TRUMPET" at the culmination of the Great Tribulation.

Mat 24:31 “And He shall send His messengers with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His chosen ones from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
1Co 15:52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

This day of the "rapture" will be both a day of great rejoicing for those who were deemed worthy to meet Him in the air, AND the start of the beginning of a huge emergency for those left behind.
The worldwide government will be fully declared by the Anti-Mashich by this time, along with lightnings, voices, thunders, an earthquake and great hail occurring on a global scale.

This last day of trumpet blasting (the seventh "trumpet"), and the six preceding "trumpet blasts" may come in the form of thunder, earthquakes, great icy and fiery hail, or other large-scale natural blasting.

After this the worst of IEUE's judgment on this unbelieving generation will be unleashed through the vials/bowls. These events (wicked sores, blood sea, blood rivers, burning sun, darkness, the Euphrates dried up) will be IEUE's FINAL WARNING until the Battle of IRUSHaLIM on the Day of Atonement (IUM KIPUR), when SHaTaN will be bound, and the 1000 year reign will commence.

Shouting IEUE's Name on the IUM TaRUOE
In Lev 23:24, IUM TaRUOE is also referred to as "ZaKRUN TaRUOE". The word "ZaKRUN" is sometimes translated as “memorial” but this Hebrew word also has the meaning of “mentioning” often in reference to speaking the name of IEUE (e.g. Ex 3:15; Isa 12:4; ; 26:13; Ps 45:18).

The day of ZaKRUN TaRUOE, the “Mentioning Shout”, may refer to a day of gathering in public prayer in which the crowd of the faithful shouts the name of IEUE in unison. http://www.karaite-korner.org/yom_teruah.shtml

Could it be that the only ones raptured will be those shouting the (correct) Name of IEUE on some future Day of Blasting?!

This aligns with the traditional IEUEDic (Jewish) blessing of "MAY YOU BE INSCRIBED & SEALED FOR A GOOD YEAR".

Only those correctly sealed using the proper Name of ALEIM, which is IEUE, will know what Name to shout on IUM TaRUOE! These people have had the Name of IEUE and his son IEUESHUO (just one word - IEUE is embedded into the Name IEUESHUO) on their foreheads (via immersion). When we are immersed we should call on IEUESHUO's Name.

Joe 2:32 “And it shall be that everyone who calls on the Name of יהוה shall be delivered. For on Mount TSIUN and in IRUSHaLIM there shall be an escape as יהוה has said, and among the survivors whom יהוה calls.
See "The Name is the Seal" for more about the importance of being sealed.

In Conclusion
The "Day of Trumpets" should actually be called the "Day of Blasting". Ancient Hebrew "TaRUOE" Means "Blast". People Can TaRUOE (Blast) Too.

The main reason why we celebrate the Day of Blasting is to envision the FUTURE event when we (prayerfully) will obtain new bodies in the sky as we possibly shout IEUE's Name, and when IEUE's period of final warning of the inhabitants of the Earth will commence.

May we be sealed FOREVER (not just for the year!) in the only name that saves - IEUESHO (IEUE Saves).

Part 1

A Special Report On The National Emergency In The United States Of America

This page contains the complete text of the book "War and Emergency Powers" A SPECIAL REPORT ON THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Researched and written by: Gene Schroder, Alvin Jenkins, Jerry Russell, Ed Petrowsky, Russell Grieder, Darrell Schroder, Walter Marston, Lynn Bitner, Billy Schroder, Van Stafford, Fred Peters, Tinker Spain, and Paul Bailey.
Due to file size limitations we have elected not to include scanned images of the exhibits that appear in the book.
The Report... WAR AND EMERGENCY POWERS

NATIONAL EMERGENCY: (as defined in Black's Law Dictionary) A state of national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a "state of national emergency" and a "state of war." 
Brown v. Bernstein, D.C.Pa., 49 F.Supp. 728, 732.
This report begins with a series of documents which are representative (Exhibits 1 through 7), of the documents contained in this Report. We will be quoting from in many cases, reports, Senate and Congressional reports, hearings before National Emergency Committees, Presidential Papers, Statutes at Large, and the United States Code.
Exhibit 8 is taken from a book written by "Swisher" called Constitutional Development. Let's read the first paragraph. It says:

"We may well wonder in view of the precedents now established," said Charles E. Hughes, (Supreme Court Justice) in 1920, "whether constitutional government as heretofore maintained in this Republic could survive another great war even victoriously waged."
How could that happen? Surely, if we go out and fight a war and win it, we'd have to end up stronger than the day we started, wouldn't we? Justice Hughes goes on to say:

"The conflict known as the World War had ended as far as military hostilities were concerned, but was not yet officially terminated. Most of the war statutes were still in effect, many of the emergency organizations were still in operation."
What is this man talking about when he speaks of "war statutes in effect and emergency organizations still in operation"?
In 1933 (Exhibit 9), Congressman Beck, speaking from the Congressional Record, states:

"I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. it means that when Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. This means its death. It is the very doctrine that the German chancellor is invoking today in the dying hours of the parliamentary body of the German republic, namely, that because of an emergency, it should grant to the German chancellor absolute power to pass any law, even though the law contradicts the Constitution of the German republic. Chancellor Hitler is at least frank about it. We pay the Constitution lipservice, but the result is the same."
Congressman Beck is saying that, of all the damnable heresies that ever existed, this doctrine of emergency has got to be the worst, because once Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. He goes on to say:

"But the Constitution of the United States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes a law, there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its Constitutional powers."
What bill is Congressman Beck talking about? In 1933, "the House passed the Farm Bill by a vote of more than three to one." Again, we see the doctrine of emergency. Once an emergency is declared, there is no Constitution. The cause and effect of the doctrine of emergency is the subject of this Report. In 1973, in Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 10), the first sentence reads:

"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency."
Let's go back to Exhibit 9 just before this. What did that say? It says that if a national emergency is declared, there is no Constitution. Now, let us return to Exhibit 10. Since March the 9th of 1933, the United States has been, in fact, in a state of declared national emergency.
Referring to the middle of this exhibit:

"This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens"
and this situation has continued uninterrupted since March the 9th of 1933.
In the introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 11):

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all their lives under emergency rule."
Remember, this report was produced in 1973. The introduction goes on to say:

"For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."
The introduction continues:

"And, in the United States, actions taken by the government in times of great crisis have from, at least, the Civil War, in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency."
How many people were taught that in school? How could it possibly be that something which could suspend our Constitution would not be taught in school? Amazing, isn't it?
Where does this (Exhibit 12) come from? Is it possible that, in our Constitution, there could be some section which could contemplate what these previous documents are referring to? In Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution of the United States of America, we find the following words:

"The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion, the public Safety may require it."
Habeas Corpus - the Great Writ of Liberty. This is the writ which guarantees that the government cannot charge us and hold us with any crime, unless they follow the procedure of due process of law. This writ also says, in effect, that the privilege of due process of law cannot be suspended, and that the government cannot not operate its arbitrary prerogative power against We the People. But we see that the great Writ of Liberty can, in fact, under the Constitution, be suspended when an invasion or a rebellion necessitates it.
In the 5th Amendment to the Constitution (Exhibit 13), it says:

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
We reserved the charging power for ourselves, didn't we? We didn't give that power to the government. And we also said that the government would be powerless to charge one of the citizens or one of the peoples of the United States with a crime unless We, the People, through our grand jury, orders it to do so through an indictment or a presentment. And if We, the People, don't order it, the government cannot do it. If it tried to do it, we would simply follow the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and they would have to release us, wouldn't they? They could not hold us.
But let us recall that, in Exhibit 13, it says:

"except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in times of War or public danger."
We can see here that the framers of the Constitution were already contemplating times when there would be conditions under which it might be necessary to suspend the guarantees of the Constitution.
Also from Senate Report 93-549 (Exhibit 14), and remember that our congressmen wrote these reports and these documents and they're talking about these emergency powers and they say:

"They are quite careful and restrictive on the power, but the power to suspend is specifically contemplated by the Constitution in the Writ of Habeas Corpus."
Now, this is well known. This is not a concept that was not known to rulers for many, many years. The concepts of constitutional dictatorship went clear back to the Roman Republic. And there, it was determined that, in times of dire emergencies, yes, the constitution and the rights of the people could be suspended, temporarily, until the crisis, whatever its nature, could be resolved.
But once it was done, the Constitution was to be returned to its peacetime position of authority. In France, the situation under which the constitution could be suspended is called the "State of Siege."  In Great Britain, it's called "The Defense of the Realm Acts."  In Germany, in which Hitler became a dictator, it was simply called "Article 48." In the United States, it is called the "War Powers."
If that was, in fact, the case, and we are under a war emergency in this country, then there should be evidence of that war emergency in the current law that exists today. That means we should be able to go to the federal code known as the USC or United States Code, and find that statute, that law, in existence. And if we went to the library today and picked up a copy of 12 USC and went to Section 95 (b) (Exhibit 15), we will find a law which states:

"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title I, Sec. 1, 48 Stat. 1.)".
Now, what does this mean? It means that everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has done since March the 4th of 1933, or anything that the President or the Secretary of the Treasury is hereafter going to do, is automatically approved and confirmed. Referring back to Exhibit 10, let us remember that, according to the Congressional Record of 1973, the United States has been in a state of national emergency since 1933. Then we realize that 12 USC, Section 95 (b) is current law. This is the law that exists over this United States this moment.
If that be the case, let us see if we can understand what is being said here. As every action, rule or law put into effect by the President or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th of 1933 has or will be confirmed and approved, let us determine the significance of that date in history. What happened on March the 4th of 1933?
On March the 4th of 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was inaugurated as President of the United States. Referring to his inaugural address, which was given at a time when the country was in the throes of the Great Depression, we read (Exhibit 16):

"I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fall to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe."
On March the 4th, 1933, at his inaugural, President Roosevelt was saying that he was going to ask Congress for the extraordinary authority available to him under the War Powers Act. Let's see if he got it.
On March the 5th, President Roosevelt asked for a special and extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038. He called for the special session of Congress to meet on March the 9th at noon. And at that Congress, he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes.
In the enabling portion of that Act (Exhibit 17), it states:

"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application."
What is the concept of the rule of necessity, referred to in the enabling portion of the act as "imperatively necessary speedily"? The rule of necessity is a rule of law which states that necessity knows no law. A good example of the rule of necessity would be the concept of self-defense. The law says, "Thou shalt not kill". But also know that, if you are in dire danger, in danger of losing your life, then you have the absolute right of self-defense. You have the right to kill to protect your own life. That is the ultimate rule of necessity.
Thus we see that the rule of necessity overrides all other law, and, in fact, allows one to do that which would normally be against the law. So it is reasonable to assume that the wording of the enabling portion of the Act of March 9, 1933, is an indication that what follows is something which will probably be against the law. It will probably be against the Constitution of the United States, or it would not require that the rule of necessity be invoked to enact it.
In the Act of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 17), it further states in Title 1, Section 1:

"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed."
Where have we read those words before?
This is the exact same wording as is found (Exhibit 15) today in Title 12, USC 95 (b). The language in Title 12, USC 95 (b) is exactly the same as that found in the Act of March 9, 1933, Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1. The Act of March 9, 1933, is still in full force and effect today. We are still under the "Rule of Necessity." We are still in a declared state of national emergency, a state of emergency which has existed, uninterrupted, since 1933, or for over sixty years.
As you may remember, the authority to do this is conferred by Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended. What was the authority which was used to declare and enact the emergency in this Act? If we look at the Act of October 6, 1917 (Exhibit 18), we see that at the top right-hand part of the page, it states that this was:

"An Act To define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for other purposes."
By the year 1917, the United States was involved in World War 1; at that point, it was recognized that there were probably enemies of the United States, or allies of enemies of the United States, living within the continental borders of our nation in a time of war.
Therefore, Congress passed this Act which identified who could be declared enemies of the United States, and, in this Act, we gave the government total authority over those enemies to do with as it saw fit. We also see, however, in Section 2, Subdivision (c) in the middle, and again at the bottom of the page:

"other than citizens of the United States."
The Act specifically excluded citizens of the United States, because we realized in 1917 that the citizens of the United States were not enemies. Thus, we were excluded from the war powers over enemies in this act.
Section 5 (b) of the same act (Exhibit 19), states:

"That the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, export or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, transfers of credit in any form (other than credits relating solely to transactions to be executed wholly within the United States)".
Again, we see here that citizens, and the transactions of citizens made wholly within the United States, were specifically excluded from the war powers of this act. "We the People", were not enemies of our country; therefore, the government did not have total authority over us as they were given over our enemies.
 It is important to draw attention again to the fact that citizens of the United States in October, 1917, were not called "enemies."  Consequently the government, under the war powers of this act, did not have authority over us; we were still protected by the Constitution. Granted, over enemies of this nation, the government was empowered to do anything it deemed necessary, but not over us. The distinction made between enemies of the United States and citizens of the United States will become crucial later on.
 In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933 (Exhibit 17), "Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows;"
So we see that they are now going to amend Section 5 (b). Now let's see how it reads after it's amended. The amended version of Section 5 (b) reads (emphasis added):

"During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that be may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as be may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof".
What just happened? At as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were concerned, the people of the United States were no longer differentiated from any other enemy of the United States. We had lost that crucial distinction. Comparing Exhibit 17 with Exhibit 19, we can see that the phrase which excluded transactions executed wholly within the United States has been removed from the amended version of Section 5 (b) of the Act of March 9, 1933, Section 2, and replaced with "by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof'. All monetary transactions, whether domestic or international in scope, were now placed at the whim of the President of the United States through the authority given to him by the Trading with the Enemy Act.
To summarize this critical point: On October the 6th of 1917, at the beginning of America's involvement in World War 1, Congress passed a Trading with the Enemy Act empowering the government to take control over any and all commercial, monetary or business transactions conducted by enemies or allies of enemies within our continental borders. That act also defined the term "enemy" and excluded from that definition citizens of the United States.
In Section 5 (b) of this act, we see that the President was given unlimited authority to control the commercial transactions of defined enemies, but we see that credits relating solely to transactions executed wholly within the United States were excluded from that controlling authority. As transactions wholly domestic in nature were excluded from authority, the government had no extraordinary control over the daily business conducted by the citizens of the United States, because we were certainly not enemies.
 Citizens of the United States were not enemies of their country in 1917, and the transactions conducted by citizens within this country were not considered to be enemy transactions. But in looking again at Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, (Exhibit 17), we can see that the phrase excluding wholly domestic transactions has been removed from the amended version and replaced with "by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof'.
The people of the United States were now subject to the power of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6,1917, as amended. For the purposes of all commercial, monetary, and, in effect, all business transactions. "We the People," became the same as the enemy, and were treated no differently. There was no longer any distinction.
It is important here to note that, in the Acts of October 6, 1917 and March 9, 1933, it states:

"during times of war or during any other national emergency declared by the President...". So we now see that the war powers not only included a period of war, but also a period of "national emergency" as defined by the President of the United States. When either of these two situations occur, the President may, (Exhibit 17) "through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate or prohibit under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and export, boarding, melting or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof."
What can the President do now to the We, the People, under this Section? He can do anything he wants to do. It's purely at his discretion, and he can use any agency or any license that he desires to control it. This is called a constitutional dictatorship.
In Senate Document 93-549 (Exhibit 20), Congress declared that a serious emergency exists, at:

"48 Stat. 1. The exclusion of domestic transactions, formerly found in the Act, was deleted from Sect. 5 (b) at this time."
Our Congress wrote that in the year 1973.
Now let's find out about the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917. Quoting from a Supreme Court decision (Exhibit 21), Stoehr v. Wallace, 1921:

"The Trading With the Enemy Act, originally and as amended, is strictly a war measure, and finds its sanction in the provision empowering Congress "to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water" Const. Art. 1, Sect. 8, c1. 11. P.241".
Remember your Constitution? "Congress shall have the power to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal and make all rules concerning the captures on the land and the water of the enemies," all rules.
If that be the case, let us look at the memorandum of law that now covers trading with the enemy, the "Memorandum of American Cases and Recent English Cases on The Law of Trading With the Enemy" (Exhibit 22), remembering that we are now the same as the enemy. In this memorandum, we read: "Every species of intercourse with the enemy is illegal. This prohibition is not limited to mere commercial intercourse."
This is the case of The Rapid (1814).
Additionally, "No contract is considered as valid between enemies, at least so far as to give them a remedy in the courts of either government, and they have, in the language of the civil law, no ability to sustain a persona standi in judicio".
In other words, they have no personal rights at law in court. This is the case of The Julia (1813).
In the next case, the case of The Sally (1814) (Exhibit 23), we read the words:

"By the general law of prize, property engaged in an illegal intercourse with the enemy is deemed enemy property. It is of no consequence whether it belong to an ally or to a citizen; the illegal traffic stamps it with the hostile character, and attaches to it all the penal consequences of enemy ownership".
Reading further in the memorandum, again from the case of The Rapid:

"The law of prize is part of the law of nations. In it, a hostile character is attached to trade, independently of the character of the trader who pursues or directs it. Condemnation to the use of the captor is equally the fate of the property of the belligerent and of the property found engaged in anti-neutral trade. But a citizen or an ally may be engaged in a hostile trade, and thereby involve his property in the fate of those in whose cause he embarks".
Again from the memorandum (Exhibit 24):

"The produce of the soil of the hostile territory, as well as other property engaged in the commerce of the hostile power, as the source of its wealth and strength, are always regarded as legitimate prize, without regard to the domicile of the owner".
From the case (Exhibit 25) of The William Bagaley (1866):

"In general, during war, contracts with, or powers of attorney or agency from, the enemy executed after outbreak of war are illegal and void; contracts entered into with the enemy prior to the war are either suspended or are absolutely terminated; partnerships with an enemy are dissolved; powers of attorney from the enemy, with certain exceptions, lapse; payments to the enemy (except to agents in the United States appointed prior to the war and confirmed since the war) are illegal and void; all rights of an enemy to sue in the courts are suspended."
From Senate Report No. 113 (Exhibit 26), in which we find An Act to Define, Regulate, and Punish Trading with the Enemy, and For Other Purposes, we read:

"The trade or commerce regulated or prohibited is defined in Subsections (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), page 4. This trade covers almost every imaginable transaction, and is forbidden and made unlawful except when allowed under the form of licenses issued by the Secretary of Commerce (p. 4, sec. 3, line 18). This authorization of trading under licenses constitutes the principal modification of the rule of international law forbidding trade between the citizens of belligerents, for the power to grant such licenses, and therefore exemption from the operation of law, is given by the bill."
It says no trade can be conducted or no intercourse can be conducted without a license, because, by mere definition of the enemy, and under the prize law, all intercourse is illegal.
That was the first case we looked at, Exhibit 22, wasn't it? So once we were declared enemies, all intercourse became illegal for us. The only way we could now do business or any type of legal intercourse was to obtain permission from our government by means of a license. We are certainly required to have a "Social Security Card," which is a license to work, and a Drivers License, which gives the government the ability to restrict travel; all business in which we engage ourselves requires us to have a license, does it not?
Returning once again to the Memorandum of Law:

(Exhibit 27) "But it is necessary always to bear in mind that a war cannot be carried on without hurting somebody, even, at times, our own citizens. The public good, however, must prevail over private gain. As we said in Bishop v. Jones (28 Texas, 294), there cannot be "a war for arms and a peace for commerce". One of the most important features of the bill is that which provides for the temporary taking over of the enemy property."
This point of law is important to keep in mind, for it authorizes the temporary takeover of enemy property. The question is: Once the war terminates, the property must be returned, mustn't it?
The property that is confiscated, and the belligerent night of the government during the period of war, must be returned when the war terminates. Let us take the case of a ship in harbor; war breaks out, and the Admiral says, "I'm seizing your ship." Can you stop him? No. But when the war is over, the Admiral must return your ship to you. This point is important to bear in mind, for we will return to, and expand upon, it later in the report.
Reading from (Exhibit 28) Senate Document No. 43, "Contracts Payable in Gold" written in 1933:

"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of government, i. e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."
Who owns all the property? Who owns the property you call "yours"? Who has the authority to mortgage property? Let us continue with a Supreme Court decision, (Exhibit 29) United States v. Russell:

"Private property, the Constitution provides, shall not be taken for public use without just compensation..."
That is the peacetime clause, isn't it? Further (emphasis added), "Extraordinary and unforeseen occasions arise, however, beyond all doubt, in cases of extreme necessity in time of war or of immediate and impending public danger, in which private property may be impressed into the public service, or may be seized or appropriated to public use, or may even be destroyed without the consent of the owner..."
This quote, and indeed this case, provides a vivid frustration of the potential power of the government.
Now, let us return to the period of time after March 4, 1933, and take a close look at what really occurred. On March 4, 1933, in his inaugural address, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt asked for the authority of the war powers, and called a special session of Congress for the purpose of having those powers conferred to him.
On March the 2nd, 1933, however, we find that Herbert Hoover had written a letter to the Federal Reserve Board of New York, asking them for recommendations for action based on the over-all situation at the time. The Federal Reserve Board responded with a resolution (Exhibit 30) which they had adopted, an excerpt from which follows:

"Resolution Adopted By The Federal Reserve Board Of New York. Whereas, in the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the continued and increasing withdrawal of currency and gold from the banks of the country has now created a national emergency ..."
In order to fully appreciate the significance of this last quote, we must recall that, in 1913, The Federal Reserve Act was passed, authorizing the creation of a central bank, the thought of which had already been noted in the Constitution. The basic idea of the central bank was, among other things, for it to act as a secure repository for the gold of the people. We, the People, would bring our gold to the huge, strong vaults of the Federal Reserve, and we would be issued a note which said, in effect, that, at any time we desired, we could bring that note back to the bank and be given back our gold which we had deposited.
Until 1933, that agreement, that contract between the Federal Reserve and its depositors, was honored. Federal Reserve notes, prior to 1933, were indeed redeemable in gold. After 1933, the situation changed drastically. In 1933, during the depths of the Depression, at the time when We, the People, were struggling to stay alive and keep our families fed, the bankers began to say: "People are coming in now, wanting their gold, wanting us to honor this contract we have made with them to give them their gold on demand, and this contractual obligation is creating a national emergency."
How could that happen? Reading from the Public Papers of Herbert Hoover (Exhibit 31):

Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that, in this emergency, the Federal Reserve Board is hereby requested to urge the President of the United States to declare a bank holiday, Sat., March 4, and Monday, March 6.
In other words, President Roosevelt was urged to close down the banking system and make it unavailable make it unavailable for a short period of time. What was to happen during that period of time?

Misc RM 63 Misc reference material Part 1

Reference Material - For Information Only!

Over time we have collected a lot of reference material.

We figured it would be better to share with all rather than just delete it.

If you want it, keep it, otherwise just delete it.

Due to the volume it will take more than one mailing.

Man is a man, not a woman. Man is a man, not a boy. YAHUAH has set forth a clear, substantive, and causative difference; and a man should, according to His holy design, preserve that difference – for his wife's sake, for the sake of his children, for the sake of YAHUAH's kingdom and His creation, for the sake of society, and for the sake of truth. Let a man proclaim: Wear the beard men! YAHUAH has set it upon your jaw. Preserve it. Uphold it. Let His distinctive identifying mark upon you be in harmony with His glory, His creation, and His purpose.

Will a beard make a man? Not necessarily. But, a beard unmistakably tells others he is a man. A sign outside a building lets one know what kind of business is inside; but it does not necessarily reveal the character or quality of the business. And if a man is not capable of even growing a beard, he is no less a man. He too should equally accept the distinctive way YAHUAH has made him (just as the man who can grow a beard should accept the way he is made). Again, what has YAHUAH shown in nature but diversity and acceptance? The raven and the dove do not lament that they have not a showy appearance over their mates. Likewise, there are whole groups of people who cannot grow beards. But that is alright. The point is – men should accept YAHUAH's individual design for them. His prevailing testimony, both in nature and in men, is that the man is to have a more striking appearance, which included a beard. Frankly, there is something to be said for the man who grows a scraggly, thin, or patchy beard and seeks to honor YAHUAH's unique and complete creation of him, when other men who can grow a robust beard remove it daily.

Men who have lesser beards should wear them proudly. The sparrow does not lament that he does not have the splendor of a peacock. The quail does not grieve that his colors do not match that of the pheasant. The dog does not sulk that he does not possess the mane of the lion. We should accept the beard YAHUAH has given us, and wear it, groom it, let it be distinctive; not for what others have, but for what each of us has been given by YAHUAH. Small or great, patchy or full, we should acceptingly wear the beard; it is YAHUAH's own distinctive design for each of us individually.

RESPECT AND INTIMACY

 Likewise, we honor YAHUAH and respect His design when we wear the beard. Wearing the beard is of YAHUAH – honoring YAHUAH our Creator who made men with a beard. It is His order for men’s faces, not fair skin like women or boys.

The beard, by the will and design of YAHUAH, is a mark of respect and intimacy. One can never know this truth unless they have grown a full beard – one which can be grasped with the hand. The Scriptures certainly assign this honor, affection, and respect of the beard. In the story of Joab and Amasa (2 Samuel 20:9-13), we find that Joab grasped Amasa's beard in a gesture of respect. Verse nine says: "And Joab said to Amasa, 'Is it well with you, my brother?' And Joab took Amasa by the beard with his right hand to kiss him."  

Though this gesture of good was used by Joab to deceive Amasa and make him vulnerable to him, whereby he killed him, it nonetheless reveals the honor and respect that was given to the beard. Throughout the Scriptures, the beard is respected. It has been a point of honor and intimacy.

David drew from that intimacy to explain a very pleasant relationship. He said, "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell together in unity!" What is that pleasantness like? The beard is a fitting expression. "It is like the precious oil upon the head, coming down upon the beard, even Aaron's beard, coming down upon the edge of his robes" (Psalm 133:1-2).

There have been precious, memorable moments when my children have intimately clasped my beard and stroked it in affection and love. I can tell you personally that their loving gesture is deeply satisfying. It is like warm oil! Children cannot show this same act of affection to mother, sister, or young brother. It is uniquely and especially for father. But men have been robbed of this fulfilling and appropriate exchange. They can only be touched on the cheek like a woman or a boy. And even then, the little ones just say – "scratchy!" Scratchy? No thanks, I'll take the beard!

“IN HIS OWN IMAGE”

Let us further examine this matter of the man being made in the image of YAHUAH. Genesis 1:26-27 state: “Then YAHUAH said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness ....' And YAHUAH created the man in His Own image, in the image of YAHUAH He created him; male and female He created them." It should be noted here that “the man” was made "in our image," in the image of the triune YAHUAH. Since YAHUASHUA has a beard (Isaiah 50:6), and He is "the image of the invisible YAHUAH" (Colossians 1:15, 2 Corinthians 4:4), it can equally be stated that YAHUAH the Father has a beard. Yes, "YAHUAH is Spirit,” but the Bible also talks about His back, His hands, His feet, His eyes. Can He not also have a beard? Indeed so, for the Son of YAHUAH has a beard!

Likewise, it is simple to reason that if the man is made in the image of YAHUAH, conversely YAHUAH has a beard. All paintings throughout history confirmingly represent Him as bearded. Since YAHUAH has a beard, He shared His image with the man and created Him to likewise wear it. Since YAHUAH shared His image with the man, for this cause alone a man seeking to glorify YAHUAH should be compelled to wear what He has personally shared with him. Gillette and Norelco are cheap and shameful escapes from the image YAHUAH bears and uniquely shared with the man.

YAHUAH is a father, not a mother. He is masculine, not feminine. He is the head, and headship is passed down with the image that He shares – to His Son, and then to the man. Headship, as laid out in 1 Corinthians 11:3, begins with  YAHUAH and ends with the man. Headship does not extend to the woman, because she is not the image of our Heavenly Father. 1 Corinthians 11:7 specifically states that the man "is the image and glory of YAHUAH; but the woman is the glory of man." The woman is not the image of man; she is not the shared image of YAHUAH; but she came from the man to make the man complete – not to compete.

In Genesis 1:27 in the New American Standard, the word "the" that is in the phrase – "YAHUAH created the man” – is not in the printed text; but it very significantly does exist in the original Hebrew and is thus inserted here. Likewise, in Genesis 9:6 YAHUAH spoke to Noah, affirming: "for in the image of YAHUAH He made the man." This is an important distinction. It was "the man" who was created first, not a man and a woman. Granted, all of mankind was in Adam, as Eve was in Adam; but Adam was created a man in the image of YAHUAH. It was "the man" who needed a helper "corresponding to" but not replacing him (Genesis 2:18). This important original text phrase – "the man" – with the definite article "the,” was accurately translated in numerous verses afterwards: Genesis 2:8, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25; 3:8, 9, 12, 20, 22, 24; 4:1. It was "the man" who was communing, walking, working on the earth. "The man" clearly identified a man, not a "male and female," but – a man.

YAHUAH created “the man" in "His own image, in the image of YAHUAH He created him, ...." The word "him" is very significantly singular, not plural – YAHUAH created Adam, a man, in His image. Then added separately, the Scriptures go on to say: "male and female He created them." It does not say: "YAHUAH created male and female in His own image." When He made the man, the woman (meaning - "taken out of man," Genesis 2:23) was in the side of the man. "Male and female He created them,” but not until after He first made the man, conformed to His own father image.

Men are not "in the image of YAHUAH" when they shave their beards. They become a confusing, distorted mixture – partly in the image of YAHUAH who made them, and partly in the image of the woman who came out of the man. Instead of being clearly identifiable bearded men, they are a woeful mix – woe-men! Men are no longer “in His own image,” but take on the distorted, self-designed appearance of “in his own image,” an image that man fashions of his own creating. Woe-men should quit sending mixed signals! YAHUAH distinctly forbids it, as in dress and hair length. Men should be absolute, not persuaded by the fashions or expectations of a corrupted society, but wear the beard He has given them from His fatherly image.

Very interestingly and most significantly, starting in Genesis, the first five instances in which the word "image" (meaning – to form a likeness) is used, four of these instances state that YAHUAH has made the man in the likeness of Himself. Four is the number which denotes YAHUAH's creation. And thus, YAHUAH gives testimony to the creation of the man in His image. The fifth usage of the word "image" in Genesis 5:3, replicates this "image" process from men to men: “When Adam had lived one hundred and thirty years, he became the father of a son in his own likeness, according to his image, and named him Seth [who was in the ancestry of Yahu'sha – Luke 3:38]." Note that it does not state that Adam produced in his own likeness his daughters; no, it was his son Seth. His daughters were in the likeness of Eve, his wife.

Five is the number for grace or YAHUAH's goodness. By YAHUAH's grace and goodness, He continues to share His image with men – from Adam, to Seth, to YAHUASHUA, and on to men today. Interestingly, it is the man's chromosomes that determine the gender of children. The woman has no influence at all on this. The male sex chromosome possesses the determining "x-y" factor; while the female chromosome possesses a nondescript "x-x" factor. Upon fertilization, the woman's egg can only share an "x" component, while the man's sperm can contribute either the "x," which will produce a daughter, or the "y," which will produce a son. To the son he gives his own chromosomal image. To the daughter he gives the woman's image.

Now back to the Scripture's use of the word image. Throughout the remainder of the Old Testament, the word "image" finds an entirely new usage. No longer does it give testimony to YAHUAH's plan to share His image with the man; but instead, in the remaining eighty-six usages of this word, it now solely denotes man's attempt to alter and recast His image into perversions and replacements – in other words, man began to make and worship images created by himself! Today men do the same. The man, who was made in YAHUAH's image, seeks again to alter His image to conform to the fair-skinned woman who was created from man. Man continues striving to become like (to worship) the created, and not the Creator. This is idolatrous to YAHUAH who has affectionately and purposefully shared His glorious image and likeness with the man. Instead of being the distinct "x-y" image YAHUAH created, man became a mutation with the "x-x" image which came from him.

The most compelling argument in favor of men wearing a beard is the fact that it is YAHUAH who placed the beard on man, a reflection of His own image. Man does not go to a fashion store and purchase one, nor does he buy seeds to sprout one, nor does he go to a plastic surgeon and have it added to his face. A beard is not the creation of man. In fact, for a man to not have a beard, he must daily resist YAHUAH’s creation. Daily he must remove what is YAHUAH's persistent will.

Men have beards not because it is something they add to their face. It is a natural, YAHUAH-given identifying feature specifically for the man. When a man does not have a beard, he must daily alter his face, YAHUAH’s image, in order to keep from having it. What is more natural than having a beard? What is more fitting with YAHUAH's creation from the beginning than having a beard? What is more in keeping with the order of YAHUAH than having a beard? What is more consistent with the image YAHUAH has shared with “the man” than having a beard? To be otherwise must be the creation of idolatrous man, not of YAHUAH! Man, by his own hand, becomes a woe-man!

MOVE OVER  LADIES

(How to abandon creation)

In the Beginning YAHUAH made man, in His very own image according to His plan .

Of sinew strong and features stark, of ruddy appearance man was not to depart!

His face was covered with hair unlike his head, but course and strong to match his stead.

His eyes were framed within this mass, and his stern jaw was covered from lad and lass.

Out of the man the woman was made; fair and frail her image was laid.

But man to the woman his image he slew, when by razor and clothing his appearance he made anew.

The point of this poem is very clear, for shaving a man from ear to ear,

Is like saying to our Creator – "I don't like how I'm made!

So move over ladies and pass me the blade!"

FOLLOWING THE WORLD’S WAYS

Despite Paul's warning to "not be conformed to this world" (Romans 12:2), the world has often regrettably set the course for the Christian's face, hair, and dress. Joseph naively gave himself to the world after being Egypt's slave and prisoner for thirteen years. In the Scriptures, Egypt represents the place of bondage and curse. It was in Egypt where, four generations earlier, great-great-grandfather Abraham jeopardized his wife, and acquired Sarah's Egyptian maid, Hagar, who concubined the son of the flesh – Ishmael. Now, likewise in Egypt, Joseph was also adversely impacted by his abode in "the world." He conformed to being like them by shaving his head and beard and dressing like the Egyptians. In Genesis 41:14 we read: “Pharaoh sent and called for Joseph, and they hurriedly brought him out of the dungeon; and when he had shaved himself and changed his clothes, he came to Pharaoh." The Hebrew word for "shaved" means – to be bald. In most cases in its usage, it means to shave the head; but in other instances it was applied to "balding" the face as well.

The Egyptians fittingly had such a disdain for YAHUAH's created hair that daily, wealthy men and women visited barbers who shaved and plucked the hair from their balded heads and face. "Hair was not only shunned but it was considered evil.... Egyptian priests had their heads and entire bodies shaved at least three times a week" (The Long And Short of It, by Bill Severn, pp. 22, 23). Such was the world this bearded Hebrew conformed to – not only in baldness but also in dress. His identity with Egypt led to other transgressions – taking an Egyptian wife, entering into the occult practice of divination (Genesis 44:5, 15), and intentionally misleading, lying to, and deceiving his brothers as he further altered his appearance. In fact, his appearance was so altered that his own family could not recognize him, though he talked face to face with them – bare-faced to bearded-faced! Joseph had conformed to Egypt, their soon-to-be captors!

I have a friend who, like Joseph, shaved his beard. In fact, his name is Joseph. As with so many others, he too at one time was concerned that his beard created an "image" that he was afraid would interfere with his worldly success. Also, he did not think it "looked good" on him, so he shaved it off. I shared this with another friend who responded – "he is trusting in the flesh, rather than faith." So true! He was relying on his conformity to the world to produce his success, and not on humbling himself before YAHUAH who would exalt him through His ways and plans. My friend was overcome by his lower nature of vanity (as so many are), being more concerned about how he appeared before other vain men and women, thereby becoming like them. Shaving the beard is most often a vain decision. Men who will not wear a beard because it makes them look older or less attractive are simply giving themselves over to pitiful vanity! (However, my friend did later become very convicted that wearing the beard was not a choice, and now wears it out of conviction.)

When shaving the beard for worldly promotion and acceptance, one relies upon the flesh, both literally and figuratively. Isn’t it interesting that it is indeed the flesh that a man misguidingly presents upon removing the beard? Every man must thus choose whether he will daily work at removing the covering YAHUAH has placed upon his flesh, and trust in self for promotion; or rest from his daily works and yield to that which YAHUAH has placed on the man's face, trusting in Him for promotion, success, acceptance, and, if necessary, a new job. A man who daily labors to keep the beard off does so by works; while a man who ceases from that daily labor enters into YAHUAH's rest – with the glorious results of a YAHUAH-honoring beard!

It seems appropriate to ask a simple question at this point: Are we to conform our lives to the standard of worldly acceptance and reward, or do we conform our lives to the plan and design of YAHUAH? The beard – this unique visible point of acceptance and trust – can be the building block for further faith and trust in YAHUAH! The natural always precedes the spiritual (1 Corinthians 15:46), and this one important natural act of accepting His beard can precede and produce added spiritual yieldedness and growth. It can be a constant, important, physical reminder of an important spiritual truth – to not trust in the flesh but in YAHUAH who made us. "YAHUAH has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and YAHUAH has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, and the base things of the world and the despised, YAHUAH has chosen, the things that are not, that He might nullify the things that are, that no man [Lit. – flesh] should boast before YAHUAH" (1 Corinthians 1:27-29). The beard in our society may seem base (though, thankfully, less so today; and not without meaning), but YAHUAH will use it as a point of spiritual growth – to cover the "flesh" in our life.

What the Egyptians did for Joseph, the Greco-Romans have accomplished for man today. It is the Greeks who have most influenced the beard's removal. Let us quote at length from the book Apologia Dome. Apologia De Barbis, edited by RB. C. Huygens (pp. 58, 59).

In Greek society, hair-style was an important aspect of liminality [the transitional phase in social status], especially during the period between youth and adulthood, when young men all shared the characteristics of their age group. The offering of cut hair to a YAHUAH was a form of thank offering or dedication through which the YAHUAH acquired some power over the person whose hair was offered. Hair was regarded as a source of life in Roman society and was cut at the approach of death. The traditional tearing of hair as a sign of grief was "the first offering or sacrifice to the dead" and has been seen by some scholars "as a substitute for blood and human sacrifice."

The beard in particular was a sign of age and physical maturity. It marked the borderline both between boys and men and between men and the YAHUAHs, who never grew old. Alexander's shaving of his beard, which inaugurated a long period of beardlessness in the Greco-Roman world, may have been inspired by his desire for the appearance of perpetual youth associated with the YAHUAHs. In ancient Greek society, the growth of a beard marked the end of the stage when a boy might legitimately be the object of sexual advances from an older man. It was also the distinction between the two major categories of performers, the juniors and the adults, in the Games. The custom of shaving was introduced at Rome probably in the third century BC.

For chronology sake, we will insert a portion from The Long And Short of It, by Bill Severn, pp. 28-29. This quote gives us further insight about the accepted styles during the time of YAHUASHUA and the early church.

Shaving was so customary by the time Cicero was delivering his orations in the 1st century BC that senators with "five-o'clock shadow" were turned away from the senate and refused their seats until they visited the barber. Caesar, it was said, went unshaven only once, during a vow to let his beard grow until he avenged a military defeat. Caligula, who became emperor in the year 37, sometimes wore a false beard of gold [as did the Egyptians]. Nero, who came to power a decade later, made a public ceremony of dedicating his beard to the YAHUAHs, presenting it at the temple in a small casket covered with jewels.

The Greco-Roman society has unquestionably had the greatest influence of any other society on man today – in government, in art, in architecture, in language, in literature, in thought, and, yes, in the clean-shaven image. But the early church rejected this YAHUAHs-worshipping vain appearance. Instead, they accepted the design of their Creator. Let us continue this quote from Apologia Dome.

Beards thus came into the Christian world with a heavy baggage of pre-historic and classical symbolism, of which the Church Fathers were not unaware. Lactantius in the De opificio Dei wrote, "It is incredible how much the reason of beard (barbae ratio) confers, either for distinguishing the maturity of bodies, or for differentiating the sexes, or for adorning virility and strength." The beard for Epiphanius was "the proper form of man,” and for Clement, the sign of his superiority to woman. In Augustine's De civitate Dei the fact that beards served "not for protection but for manly adornment" was evidence that some things were placed on the body for decoration rather than for use. These texts helped to establish the basic Christian view of beards, in both East and West, as the natural mark of manhood, both in a general and in a specifically sexual sense. According to a medieval proverb, "A beard suites a man."

To specifically examine what the early church fathers did say about removing the beard, let us quote from the book, Why I Wear A Beard, by William R. Mc Grath, pp. 15-16. Here he quotes the early church fathers.

From Clement of Alexandria (ca. 190 AD): "Men are also infected with the disease of vanity.... But for those who are men to shave and smooth themselves; how ignoble! ... how womanly! For YAHUAH wished women to be smooth, and rejoice in their locks alone growing spontaneously, as a horse in his mane; but has adorned man, like the lions, with a beard, and endowed him, as an attribute of manhood, with hairy chest – a sign this of strength and rule. This, then, the mark of the man, the beard, by which he is seen to be a man, is older than Eve, and is the token of the superior nature.... It is therefore impious to desecrate the symbol of manhood, hairiness. But the embellishment of smoothing (for I am warned by the word), if it is to attract men, is the act of an effeminate person, if to attract woman is the act of an adulterer; and both must be driven as far as possible from our society. 'But the very hairs of your head are all numbered,' says the Lord; those on the chin, too, are numbered .... For it is not lawful to pluck out the beard, man's natural and noble ornament.”

From Tertullian (160-220 AD): "Are there then, some things that to men are also not permissible, if we are YAHUAH-fearing, and have a due regard for gravity? There are indeed .... My own sex recognizes some tricks of beauty which are peculiarly ours, for example, to cut the beard too sharply, to pluck it out in places; to shave round about the corners; to arrange the hair and conceal grayness by dyes .... But all these tricks are rejected by (Christians) as being frivolous and hostile to modesty, as soon as the knowledge of YAHUAH has destroyed the wish to please."

From Cyprian (195-258 AD): who was writing of the reasons for apostasy among the churches, mention is made of a worldliness among church members which led them to have "no discipline in manners. Men defaced their beards (or wore their beards disfigured), and the beauty of women was a (painted) counterfeit. Their eyes were changed from what YAHUAH had made them, and a lying color was placed upon the hair."

From Lactantius (240-320 AD), we read a condemnation of the effete and effeminate walk, dress and appearance of the worldly men and a defense of the beard for Christians: “The nature of the beard contributes in an incredible degree to distinguish the maturity of bodies, to the distinction of sex, and to the beauty of manliness and strength; so that it appears that the system of the whole (body) would not have been in agreement if anything had been made otherwise than it is.”

As in the words of YAHUASHUA to a hardened world concerning divorce, we see that, though men of YAHUAH shave today, "from the beginning it has not been this way" (Matthew 19:8). The early church had a single-hearted resistance to effeminatizing the man by vainly removing YAHUAH's appointed beard. But due to division of heart between the vanity of this world and YAHUAH's design, man has defaced his appearance. One must choose whether he will establish his appearance like unto the examples of Abraham, Moses, Eli, David, YAHUASHUA, et al; or rather, like unto the Egyptians and Greco-Romans and those today who follow in their denuding practices. And in making this decision; remember, the first and last men in the Bible to shave, Joseph and Paul, were thereby given into bondage and death by both of these.

A POEM BY A BEARD

I'm on, I'm off, I'm sometimes a snare;
For some I'm never seen – I'm the beard of your hair.
For some I'm an offense, for others a joy;
When I'm left to grow, for the baby I'm a toy!
Affectionately held and stroked with the hand, I like my position on the jaw of a man.
In the past I was even regal and wisdom sublime.
But since Alexander and Nero I've changed in time.
Men like to hide me, remove me, and cut me each day;
And if you will listen, I'll tell you what I'd say.
From the beginning I was the Master's plan;
But man thought himself wiser and removed me by hand.
So now I am hidden by man wise in himself;
No longer do I grow but cut by razor on shelf!
I guess in time men will come to see,
That his and my Creator is wiser than thee.
So please let me be the glory of YAHUAH;
And let me adorn you and accent your nod.
Please let me be that mane in the hand,
Of respectful men, of wisdom in land.
And distinguish yourself, young budding lad,
From sister and mother, and grow up like dad.
A hearty "AMEN!" I’ll shout through the land,
When men wise put down razors, and once again stroke me in hand!

LET THERE BE BEARDS

We know Yahuah did not create anything without a purpose. He did not put hair on the man's face just because it was a cute, unfulfilling, or even distracting idea, or just to needlessly cover a face. YAHUAH gave us hands for a purpose. He gave us feet for a purpose. He gave us eyes, ears, taste, feel, everything for a purpose. He does not make mistakes or add to His creation needlessly. When YAHUAH said, ”Let there be ...,” He included a beard on a man. So, “Let there be” a beard on His created man!
YAHUAH has numerous purposes for the beard – to distinguish the sexes, to distinguish from adolescence, to place His image upon the man, and far more, as we will see in the pages yet before us. But when men remove this distinguishing mark, they confuse creation and YAHUAH's order in masculine headship, promoting an unmooring and slipping away from His ways.

Women may try to wear our clothes. They may work at our jobs and join the military. They may teach in seminaries and become pastors and priests. But there is one thing they can never do, no not ever – they can never grow the beard! The beard is clearly and overtly male! But, woe-men shamefully accommodate the woman's inability and cut it off!

I am humored by men's perception that today's trend of a boy, or even now a man, wearing an earring is an unacceptable departure from masculinity and a move toward femininity. Yet those very men who share these remarks and would not follow their example, are often clean-shaven like the appearance of a woman. Actually, men have been desensitized to the more extreme, yet now accepted, marked change in appearance through the feministic removal of the man's beard. In times past it would have been an unthinkable shame for a man to shave his beard. In fact, the removal of a man's beard was so offensive that some crimes were punishable by its humiliating removal. Remember, King David would not even allow his partially shaven men to return until their beards returned (2 Samuel l0:1-5). Where has the beardless stigma gone? It was removed by Satan and fallen worldly man as men accepted feminization.

Shaving a man's beard off is a far greater and more destructive departure from masculinity than any earring in one's ear. There are no specific scriptures denouncing wearing an earring; but there are numerous specific scripture's denouncing shaving the beard (Leviticus 19:27, 21:5-6)! Those same boys who put an earring in their ear(s), would have in other times shaved their beards. "In the beginning man created YAHUAH in His own image!" No! It is time for men to accept the image YAHUAH made a man to be – returning back to "in the beginning YAHUAH" when a man had a beard!

A man growing a beard will not necessarily bring instant results, either in himself or in the world. But it is an important formative, harmonious truth that should be followed. The mind of YAHUAH is expressed in a trinity – first wisdom, then understanding, and then knowledge. Man perverts this by reversing it and saying – first knowledge, which brings understanding, and then comes wisdom. But no – first pursue wisdom! Knowledge without understanding and wisdom is dangerous and erroneous.

In this set apart process, growing the beard that YAHUAH planted is wisdom. One cannot fully understand nor express some truths apart from this harmony with YAHUAH's plan for the man. With this initial wisdom will come understanding – understanding about his role as a man, as a father, and as a husband; understanding his headship and his great responsibilities therewith; and understanding his relationship with his Heavenly Father, who governmentally and purposefully shared His image with him. And to understanding will come knowledge – a true confirmed knowing of his role in all three of these areas, and more. The beard is a marked reminder of his important commitment to and progress in the ways of his Creator. It is a beginning, or a renewed commitment, to pursuing the mind and will of YAHUAH.

YAHUAH gave the man the beard. We need to quit resisting it, establishing ourselves as wiser than our Creator, and let it bear fruit. There are indeed fruits of obedience; and there are valuable and important fruits from growing the beard that YAHUAH has given the man. Let a man thus look to Him to bear these fruits. Let the man rejoice that he has come into harmony with His will and design. YAHUAH will bear the fruit if we look wholly to Him.

And before we move on, let us consider some caution about restoring the beard back to its original place. The beard is not an end in itself, but a means to an end – a beginning for some, a continuation for others. The beard is a reminder, a sign of being a man who sets his heart for the will and design of the Father and for the care and love of his wife and children. This headship that YAHUAH has given the man cannot be in stern harshness, but in firm but caring love. The coarseness of a man's beard should not reflect harshness; but as the mercy seat covers the ark of the covenant which contained the Law, in like manner let the man's facial hair give caring testimony to the need for mercy on the stern and powerful jaw of the man. Let the strength of the hair on a man's face show the strength of mercy and compassion in one's life.

Bearded men should pray that YAHUAH would lead them to be the godly heads that He would have them to be – in submission to Yahuashua's headship, and in true, honorable, responsible, and right headship to one's wife, family, and others. Let him pray that as he has yielded himself to YAHUAH's design for his head, that He will complete that design for his entire self according to His perfect will. Let him yield to YAHUAH in like appearance, that he might be reflective of Him in like purpose and actions – yielding to Him in hope that he might be like Him.
If you are a husband, love your wife. Be the man YAHUAH has called and created you to be.

Lovingly "groom" your wife. As "grooms" we be called, men; then to "groom" let us be about. As Yahuashua is preparing a bride, let us "groom" our brides to be set apart with care – knowing that our prayers are hindered when we fail (1 Peter 3:7). And let us grow our beards as YAHUAH intended it to be. Let the beard be the mark of calling for you to be His intended husband and father in YAHUAH's image. Do not put your confidence in a beard, but put your confidence in Him who purposefully gave you the beard. As YAHUAH gave you a beard as a man, seek Him to likewise provide the grace and fruit to be a man of YAHUAH.

Hope you enjoyed this

Ben

DEUTERONOMY 16 PASSOVER CONTROVERSY ANSWERED

By C L Page Revised 1/15/2008 – lawman@comcast.net Proofed by Robin Gilbertson

EXODUS 12 - THE ORIGINAL PASSOVER COMMAND – Four points to keep in mind.

1 Passover was commanded to be done by the householder & in the homes!

2 It was to be slain & eaten the same night that Yahuah (YHWH) killed all the firstborn of Egypt!

3 One being clean for Passover was not a requirement nor a command!

4 Passover was commanded to be done forever & throughout all of Israel's generations!

Exodus 12:14 "And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to Yahuah >> throughout your generations <<; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance >> for ever<<."-Did Yahuah lie when He said, this thing is forever and throughout all generations?

YAHUAH PERSONALLY SUPERVISED THE SECOND PASSOVER OF NUMBERS 9 – The second Passover set the pattern, as it was the first of all future Passovers, therefore showing the way for the proper keeping of the Passover for all future generations, so that we would get it right! Yahuah had it recorded in the book of Numbers ninth chapter, to show us how He wanted all the future Passovers to be kept. So did He change the Passover, from the original Passover that was done in Egypt? We'll let Yahuah Himself tell you.

Numbers 9:1-3 And Yahuah spake unto Moses in the wilderness of Sinai, in the first month of the second year after they were come out of the land of Egypt, saying, 2 Let the children of Israel also keep the passover at His appointed season. 3 In the fourteenth day of this month, at even, ye shall keep it in His appointed season: according to all the rites of it, and according to all the ceremonies thereof, shall ye keep it.

AT THE SAME TIME - Numbers 9:3 In the fourteenth day of this month, at even, ... .

WITH THE SAME RITES - Numbers 9:3 ... according to all the rites of it, ... .

& WITH THE SAME CEREMONIES - Numbers 9:3 ... , and according to all the ceremonies thereof, shall ye keep it.

Oh, oh! No change!

PASSOVER IS TO BE AN EXACT RE-ENACTMENT OF THE ORIGINAL IN EGYPT! Therefore Pesach (Passover) is to be an exact re-enactment of the original that was kept in Egypt. So now we can know exactly how our Passovers, are to be done today.

Now don't get confused about the "being clean thing" that was merely a function of doing Passover within the camp of Israel and in the presence of Yahuah as they were traveling in His camp to the promised land.

So… Was Yahuah confused about the Pesach (Passover)? Was Yahuah just kidding us or did He lie to us? Are the Passover Commands really NOT forever and really NOT throughout all generations?

DOES YAHUAH LIE? DOES HE GO BACK ON HIS WORD? - Numbers 23:19 El is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should change His mind. Does He speak and then not act? Does He promise and not fulfill?

Once Yahuah gives His word on something, He always comes through or acts on that promise or oath.

Could a speech or sermon by Moshe, some forty years later just across the river from the promised land, annul Yahuah's words OF Exodus 12:14? -- And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to Yahuah throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance forever. The answer is "of course not", for if Yah would go back on His word, that would make Him a liar!

A CONFIRMED & VALID COVENANT CANNOT BE ANNULLED OR AMENDED! Galatians 3:15-17 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Messiah. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of "G-d" in Messiah, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. (KJV)

(Start Quote)

Though it be but a man's covenant - A compact or agreement between man and man. Even in such a case no one can add to it or take from it. The argument here is, that such a covenant or agreement must be much less important than a promise made by "G-d". But even that could not be annulled. How much less, therefore, could a covenant made by "God" be treated as if it were vain. The word "covenant" here (diatheke) is in the margin rendered "Testament;" that is, will. So Tyndale renders it. Its proper Classical signification is will or testament, though in the Septuagint and in the New Testament it is the word which is used to denote a covenant or compact; see the note at Act_3:25. Here it is used in the proper sense of the word covenant, or compact; a mutual agreement between man and man. The idea is, that where such a covenant exists; where the faith of a man is solemnly pledged in this manner, no change can be made in the agreement. It is ratified, and firm, and final. "If it be confirmed." By a seal or otherwise.

No man disannulleth ... - It must stand. No one can change it. No new conditions can be annexed; nor can there be any drawing back from its terms. It binds the parties to a faithful fulfillment of all the conditions. This is well understood among people; and the apostle says that the same thing must take place in regard to "G-d".

(End of quote from Barnes commentary)

Could Yahuah go back on His own word? No, for that would make Him a liar! Therefore, after giving His word on a matter, it is a forever thing and not even He Himself can change it. Yahuah does not and cannot lie, therefore He cannot go back on His own word. Therefore the Passover commands must stand inviolate, not violated or profaned; intact!

MESSIANICS AND JEWS CLAIM THAT YAHUAH LIED

The majority of Messianics and Jews claim that Yahuah lied, that He went back on His word (lied) and changed the way Passover was to be conducted. We have people claiming that forty years later, as recorded in the book of Deuteronomy, that Yahuah changed the Passover command, that He lied to us at the Passover in Egypt when He said that this Passover ordinance was forever and throughout all generations! That He was mistaken in the wilderness, as recorded in the Book of Numbers the ninth chapter, when He instructed us that the Pesach was to be done at the same time with all the rites and ceremonies of it. That the future Passovers were to be an exact re-enactment of the original one done in Egypt.

Most Jews and Messianics use a man made commandment or device called "the Seder" with all the dangers involved with misrepresenting the Almighty's Pesach commandments, just so that they do not have to keep the "memorial", the "Lamb Barbie", "the Passover dinner of honor" to the great King of the Universe.

DEU 16:2-16 IS ABOUT THE PILGRIM FEASTS - It is actually talking about the Pilgrim Feasts of Hag Matzos, Hag Shavuot, and Hag Succot. The sixteenth verse summarizes what was being discussed:

Deuteronomy 16:16 Three times (3) in a year shall all thy males appear before Yahuah thy Elohim in the place which He shall choose; in the (1) Feast of Unleavened Bread, and in the (2) feast of weeks, and in the (3) feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before Yahuah empty:

Also when we look at a separate list of the Pilgrim Feasts we have the same exact list! See below:

Exodus 23:14-17 Three times thou shalt keep a feast unto Me in the year. 15 Thou shalt keep the (1) Feast of Unleavened Bread: (thou shalt eat unleavened bread seven days, as I commanded thee, in the time appointed of the month Abib; for in it thou camest out from Egypt: and none shall appear before Me empty:) 16 And the (2) feast of harvest, the firstfruits of thy labours, which thou hast sown in the field: and the (3) feast of ingathering, which is in the end of the year, when thou hast gathered in thy labours out of the field. 17 Three (3) times in the year all thy males shall appear before the master Yahuah.

OOPS - PASSOVER IS MISSING - What do we find, Passover is not in the list? Wow! Passover is separate from the pilgrim feasts as are also the Feast of Trumpets - Hag Teruah, the Day of Atonement - Yom Kippur and the Last Festive Day that occurs immediately after the last day of Hag Succot!

PASSOVER IS NOT PART OF FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD - Passover, Trumpets, Day of Atonement, and Last Festive Day are not part of the three pilgrim feasts!

PASSOVER IS ALWAYS THE 14^TH - (remember a calendar day always begins at sunset; i.e. the evening is always the first half of the day, and the lighted part (daylight) being the 2^nd half of the day).

Exodus 12:6 And ye shall keep it up until the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.

Leviticus 23:5 Yahuah's Passover begins at twilight ON THE FOURTEENTH DAY of the first month. (NIV)

Numbers 9:5 And they kept the passover in the first month, ON THE FOURTEENTH DAY of the month, in the evening, in the wilderness of Sinai; according to all that Yahuah commanded Moses, so the people of Israel did.

Numbers 28:16 And in the fourteenth day of the first month is the passover of Yahuah.

Joshua 5:10 And the children of Israel encamped in Gilgal, and kept the passover on the fourteenth day of the month at even in the plains of Jericho.

HAG MATZOS (UNLEAVENED BREAD) IS ALWAYS THE 15^TH

Leviticus 23:6 On the fifteenth day of that month Yahuah's feast of unleavened bread begins; for seven days you must eat bread made without yeast. (NIV)

Numbers 28:17 And on the fifteenth day of this month is a feast; seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten. 18 On the first day there shall be a holy convocation: you shall do no laborious work,

Numbers 29:12 12 And on the fifteenth day of the seventh month ye shall have a holy convocation; ye shall do no servile work, and ye shall keep a feast unto Yahuah seven days:

DEU 16:2-8 COULD NOT POSSIBLY BE TALKING ABOUT - The Pesach offering as part of the Hag Matzos or Feast of Unleavened Bread, for the pesach had to be slain on the first hour of the 14th and Hag Matzos does not start till the 15th. So it could only be talking about the offerings on the Feast associated with the next day following the Passover, the feast of Unleavened Bread - Hag Matzos.

REMEMBER - A VALID COVENANT CANNOT BE NULLIFIED BY ANOTHER LATER COVENANT

Galatians 3:15-17 Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. 16 The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed," meaning one person, who is the Messiah. 17 What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by Yah and thus do away with the promise. (NIV)

Genesis 17:7 And I will establish my covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be Elohim to you and to your descendants after you.

Luke 1:71-72 that we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all who hate us; 72 to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember His holy covenant,

2 Samuel 23:5 Yea, does not my house stand so with El? For He has made with me an everlasting covenant, ordered in all things and secure. For will He not cause to prosper all my help and my desire?

YAHUAH WILL KEEP HIS WORD - HE DOES NOT & CANNOT LIE

Ecclesiastes 3:14 I know that, whatsoever Elohim doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and Elohim doeth [it], that [men] should fear before Him.

James 1:17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from

the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.

Hebrews 6:17-18 Because Yahuah wanted to make the unchanging nature of His purpose very clear to the heirs of what was

>>PROMISED<<, He confirmed it with an >>OATH<<. 18 Yahuah did this so that, by TWO UNCHANGEABLE THINGS IN WHICH IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YAHUAH TO LIE, we who have fled to take hold of the hope offered to us may be greatly encouraged. (NIV)

Titus 1:2 a faith and knowledge resting on the hope of eternal life, which Yahuah,

who does not lie, promised before the beginning of time, (NIV)

Psalm 89:34-35 I will not violate My covenant or alter what My lips have uttered. 35 Once for all, I have sworn by My holiness -- and I will not lie to David -- (NIV)

To go back on one's word is to lie!!! Yahuah does not go back on His word. He does not lie!

TEXTUAL DISCREPANCIES OF DEUTERONOMY 16:2-8

DEUTERONOMY 16:2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice the passover unto Yahuah our Elohim, >>>OF THE FLOCK<<< <06629 tso'n> >>>AND<<< >>>THE HERD<<< <01241 baqar>, in the place which Yahuah shall choose to place His name there.

Here the Pesach (Passover) can be: "OF THE FLOCK" 06629 tso'n 1) small cattle, sheep, sheep and goats, flock, flocks… "AND", and that is a "BIG AND", according to this verse you have to sacrifice from BOTH "the flock AND the herd" for Passover! How ridiculous can this thing get? So all of a sudden a lamb is not good enough for Passover anymore!

Deuteronomy 16:2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice the passover ... of the flock >>> and <<< the herd, ... .

OF THE HERD – OX – BULL OR COW

Now who has ever heard of a Passover cow? Passover ox? or Passover bull? Ridiculous!!!! Sounds like "bull" to me, how about you? Yahuah clearly commanded that it had to be a "flockling" (Hebrew “seh"), a lamb or goat, in His instructions for Pesach (Passover) at Exodus 12 and as reaffirmed in Numbers 9.

Exodus 12:3 ... In the tenth day of this month they shall take to them every man a flockling <07716 seh>, according to the house of their fathers, a flockling <07716 seh> for an house: … 5 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take it out from the sheep, or from the goats: (KJV)

07716 seh 1) one of a flock, lamb, sheep, goat, young sheep, young goat 1a) sheep, goat 1b) flock (collective)

WE KNOW NOW THAT DEUTERONOMY 6:2 HAS BEEN ALTERED - We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that a lying scribe has had his "fingers in the pie" here at Devarim 16:2, for as it stands at the present time, it constitutes a lie. The Pesach (Passover) cannot be taken from the herd!

If the word Passover is changed to offering (Zabach), the text becomes truth, here in Dev 16:2. So it appears that one word was changed by some lying scribe. -- Deuteronomy 16:2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice OFFERINGS unto Yahuah thy Elohim, of the flock and the herd, in the place which Yahuah shall choose to place His name there.

This seems to be the case with verse five also. Here, as it is presented, it is a lie. Change the word the Passover to Offering-zabach and it becomes truth, for it is referring to a pilgrim feast (A feast that you have to travel to attend in the place that Yahuah directs us).

Deuteronomy 16:5 Thou mayest not sacrifice >>the PASSOVER<< within any of thy gates, which Yahuah thy Elohim giveth thee:

CHANGING ONE WORD AND IT BECOMES TRUTH:

Deuteronomy 16:5 Thou mayest not sacrifice the >>OFFERINGS<< [for Hag Matzos – A pilgrim feast] within any of thy gates, which Yahuah thy Elohim giveth thee:

DEUTERONOMY 16:6 But at the place which Yahuah thy Elohim shall choose to place His name in, there thou shalt sacrifice >> THE PASSOVER << at even, at the going down of the sun, at the season that thou camest forth out of Egypt.

BECOMES:

Deuteronomy 16:6 But at the place which Yahuah thy Elohim shall choose to place His name in, there thou shalt sacrifice the

OFFERINGS at even, at the going down of the sun, at the season that thou camest forth out of Egypt.

Deuteronomy sixteen verse seven would be flawed if it referred to the Pesach (Passover) but not if it referred to an offering for Hag Matzos. As the Pesach as commanded to be only cooked or roasted over fire, not boiled or fried! But if referring to the Hag Matzos it is precisely true! Deut 16:7 does not say roast <06748 tsaliy> in the Hebrew but cook <01310 bashal>

Deuteronomy 16:7 And thou shalt roast cook <01310 bashal> and eat it in the place which Yahuah thy Elohim shall choose: and thou shalt turn in the morning, and go unto thy tents.

01310 bashal / beshal a primitive root; v; 1) to boil, cook, bake, roast, ripen, grow ripe – Means "to soften" That is why it is used of both of the ripening of fruit and of cooking food. Both processes soften the fruit or food both to the tooth and to the palate. In the case of food, it means to cook by any means, to boil, to bake, fry or to roast, so as to soften or condition the food for eating . To translate it “roast” is an interpretation, a fraud, for it just as surely can be translated boil. The Hebrew word "Beshel" simply means "to cook" by any means, in any way, even boiled.

^CSB Deuteronomy 16:7 You are to cook and… CSB - Holman Christian Standard Bible⌐

^ESV Deuteronomy 16:7 And you shall cook it and … ENGLISH STANDARD VERSION (ESV).

^NAS Deuteronomy 16:7 "And you shall cook <01310> … The New American Standard Bible (NASB)

^YLT Deuteronomy 16:7 and thou hast cooked

^TNK Deuteronomy 16:7 You shall cook … JPS TANAKH 1985 (English)

BUT - THE PESACH MUST ONLY BE ROASTED ONLY OVER FIRE - We know cooking by any other means other than roasted over fire, was clearly prohibited by the original command for the Pesach (Passover).

Exodus 12:9 Do not eat the meat raw or cooked <01310 bashal> in water, but roast <06748 tsaliy> it over the fire ... . (06748 tsaliy {tsaw-lee'} pass part of 06740; TWOT - 1915a; 1) roasted, roast)

HAG MATZOS – FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD - THE FIRST PILGRIM FEAST We can easily see that all of the foregoing, from Deu 16:2 to Deu 16:7, was referring to Hag Matzos - the Feast of Unleavened Bread, a Pilgrim feast. and now we come to the command for the Hag Shavuot - the feast of weeks.

SHAVUOT - FEAST OF WEEKS - THE SECOND PILGRIM FEAST:

Deuteronomy 16:10 And thou shalt keep the feast of weeks unto Yahuah thy Elohim with a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand, which thou shalt give unto Yahuah thy Elohim, according as Yahuah thy Elohim hath blessed thee:

SUCCOT - FEAST OF WEEKS THE THIRD PILGRIM FEAST:

Deuteronomy 16:13 Thou shalt observe the feast of tabernacles seven days, after that thou hast gathered in thy corn and thy wine:

DEU 16:16 SUMMARIZES THE SUBJECTS COVERED VERSES 2 THROUGH 15 IN THIS CHAPTER:

And finally the text summarizes all with the listing of the three pilgrim feasts, the subject all along up to this point. The Pilgrim feasts were feasts where all the men of Israel had to travel and appear before Yahuah AT THE PLACE HE WOULD CHOSE:

Deuteronomy 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before Yahuah thy Elohim in the place which He shall choose; in the (1) Feast of Unleavened Bread, and in the (2) feast of weeks, and in the (3) feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before Yahuah empty:

So this is how it should read without the fabrications or possibly missing text of some Scribe or Scribes!

DEUTERONOMY/DEVARIM 16 AS IT SHOULD READ BEFORE SCRIBAL CHANGES - Note! My changes bring the text closer to the original intent of the original text and are marked below by >>> and <<<.

COMMANDS OBSERVANCE OF THE NEW MOON OF ABIB Deuteronomy 16:1 "Observe the month of Abib, ... ."

COMMANDS OBSERVANCE OF PESACH (PASSOVER) Deuteronomy 16:1 "... and keep the Passover unto Yahuah thy Elohim: ... ."

COMMANDS OBSERVANCE OF HAG MATZOS FIRST PILGRIM FEAST 16:2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice >>> OFFERINGS <<< unto Yahuah thy Elohim, of the flock and the herd, in the place which Yahuah shall choose to place His name there. EAT UNLEAVENED BREAD FOR SEVEN DAYS! 3 Thou shalt eat no leavened bread with >>> THEM <<<; SEVEN DAYS SHALT THOU EAT UNLEAVENED BREAD THEREWITH, even the bread of affliction; for thou camest forth out of the land of Egypt in haste: that thou mayest remember the day when thou camest forth out of the land of Egypt all the days of thy life. 4 And there shall be NO LEAVENED BREAD SEEN WITH THEE IN ALL THY TERRITORY SEVEN DAYS; neither shall there anything of the flesh, which thou sacrificedst the first day at even, remain all night until the morning. 5 Thou mayest not sacrifice the >>> OFFERING <<< within any of thy gates, which Yahuah thy Elohim giveth thee: 6 But at the place which Yahuah thy Elohim shall choose to place His name in, there thou shalt sacrifice the >>> OFFERING <<< at even, at the going down of the sun, at the season that thou camest forth out of Egypt. 7 And thou shalt cook and eat it in the place which Yahuah thy Elohim shall choose: and thou shalt turn in the morning, and go unto thy tents. 8 SIX DAYS THOU SHALT EAT UNLEAVENED BREAD: AND ON THE SEVENTH DAY SHALL BE A SOLEMN ASSEMBLY TO YAHUAH THY ELOHIM: THOU SHALT DO NO WORK THEREIN.

COMMANDS OBSERVANCE OF FEAST OF WEEKS THE SECOND PILGRIM FEAST 16:9 Seven weeks shalt thou number unto thee: begin to number the seven weeks from such time as thou beginnest to put the sickle to the corn. 10 And thou shalt keep the feast of weeks unto Yahuah thy Elohim with a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand, which thou shalt give unto Yahuah thy Elohim, according as Yahuah thy Elohim hath blessed thee: 11 And thou shalt rejoice before Yahuah thy Elohim, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy manservant, and thy maidservant, and the Levite that is within thy gates, and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are among you, in the place which Yahuah thy Elohim hath chosen to place His name there. 12 And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in Egypt: and thou shalt observe and do these statutes.

COMMANDS OBSERVANCE OF FEAST OF TABERNACLES THE THIRD PILGRIM FEAST 16:13 Thou shalt OBSERVE THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES SEVEN DAYS, after that thou hast gathered in thy corn and thy wine: 14 And thou shalt rejoice in thy feast, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy manservant, and thy maidservant, and the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are within thy gates. 15 Seven days shalt thou keep a solemn feast unto Yahuah thy Elohim in the place which Yahuah shall choose: because Yahuah thy Elohim shall bless thee in all thine increase, and in all the works of thine hands, therefore thou shalt surely rejoice.

LISTS THE THREE PILGRIM FEASTS BEING ADDRESSED 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before Yahuah thy Elohim in the place which He shall choose; in the (1) FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD, and in the (2) FEAST OF WEEKS, and in the (3) FEAST OF TABERNACLES: and they shall not appear before Yahuah empty: 17 Every man shall give as he is able, according to the blessing of Yahuah thy Elohim which He hath given thee.

There are more Passover articles, Email me if you want them.

End ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PASSOVER TIMING

WHEN IS “AT EVEN” ( BAYN HAERBAIM)

By Carroll L. Page Rev 11-30-2007

There is a big controversy as to exactly what part of the day the Passover lamb is to be slaughtered. It is centered around the expression “evening” and the usage of forms of the Hebrew word “erev” such as "bayn haerbaim". The contention has been made that it means afternoon till dark, a 6 hour or so period of time. The Rabbi’s seem to think that it is a period from two in the afternoon till sunset. It has also been postulated by some that it means between the two sunsets, one occurring at the beginning and the other at the ending of a day, a 24 hour period of time. We intend to settle this matter, here and now, in the following citations & examples.

Bayn haerbaim is a Hebrew phrase in which the word "erev" is in the dual plural form. The Hebrew language has two plural forms: The dual plural form meaning two and only two and the regular plural form meaning any number more than one. “HaErbaim” literally means “the two evenings” and since “bayn” means “between”, the full expression "bayn haerbaim" means "between the two evenings".

I will address the three (3) points listed below that will prove that this expression means a time after sunset till full dark, a time of diminishing light. These scriptural points will prove that the Hebrew phrase “bayn haerbaim” has the same meaning as the English word “Twilight”, a one hour or so period of time at the start of each Scriptural calendar day that commences at sunset.

I - LIGHTING OF THE TABERNACLE LAMPS 

II - EXODUS 16 USE OF "Bayn HaErbaim" 

III - EXODUS 12 PASSOVER FACTS

I - LIGHTING OF THE TABERNACLE LAMPS

Exodus 30:8 And when Aaron lighteth the lamps at even (bayn haerbaim), he shall burn incense upon it, a perpetual incense before Yahuah throughout your generations. (KJV)

Now we know that he didn't light the lamps in the afternoon at 2 or 3 PM, don't we? Anyone that has lived for long periods of time without electricity knows when the lamps are lit, in the twilight. So the NIV properly translate it as:

LAMPS LIT “BETWEEN THE TWO EVENINGS” – DURING THE TWILIGHT

Exodus 30:8 He must burn incense again when he lights the lamps at twilight (bayn haerbaim) so incense will burn regularly before Yahuah for the generations to come. (NIV)

When the sun is up there would be no reason to light the lamps! Those of us (like myself), that in our early years did not have electricity, know when it is time to light the oil lamps. No one had to tell us, we knew by the dimming light when we needed to light the lamps but it was always after sunset. We never lit the lamps at two pm or even at sunset but always at some point after that, during the twilight.

Therefore the Lamps were lit after sunset, and was made necessary by the diminishing light.

The Lamps were lit in the twilight

2) EXODUS 16 USE OF "Bayn HaErbaim"

Another point that confirms that it happens after sunset but before sunrise is the Ex 16 account concerning the Quail, but it will take a little work and thought on our part to see this.

TO RAIN BREAD FOR THE NEXT SIX DAYS

Exodus 16:4-5 Then Yahuah said to Moses, "I will rain down bread from heaven for you. The people are to go out each day and gather enough for that day. ...

5 on the sixth day they are to prepare what they bring in, and that is to be twice as much as they gather on the other days."

Exodus16:6-7 And Moses and Aaron said unto all the children of Israel, At even, then ye shall know that the LORD hath brought you out from the land of Egypt: 7 And in the morning, then ye shall see the glory of the LORD; for that he heareth your murmurings against the LORD: and what are we, that ye murmur against us? (KJV)

TO EAT FLESH IN EVENING (JUST PRIOR TO MANNA FALLING)

Notice verses 8 & 12 both verses refer the same event “the eating of flesh”, but refer to it using two different terms, the word “erev” and the phrase "bayn haerbaim" showing that these terms are concurrent events. Therefore both “erev” and "bayn haerbaim" occur before sunrise or morning, because “in the morning” they are to eat bread to the full.

Exodus16:8 And Moses said, This shall be, when Yahuah shall give you

in the evening (baerev) flesh to eat, and in the morning bread to the full; for that Yahuah heareth your murmurings which ye murmur against him: and what are we? your murmurings are not against us, but against Yahuah. (KJV)

 Exodus16:9-11 And Moses spake unto Aaron, Say unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, Come near before the LORD: for he hath heard your murmurings. 10 And it came to pass, as Aaron spake unto the whole congregation of the children of Israel, that they looked toward the wilderness, and, behold, the glory of the LORD appeared in the cloud. 11 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, (KJV)

Exodus16:12 I have heard the murmurings of the children of Israel: speak unto them, saying, At even (bayn haerbaim) ye shall eat flesh, and in the morning ye shall be filled with bread; and ye shall know that I am Yahuah your G-d. (KJV)

So: If it is going to rain Manna the next morning & for the next five mornings, for a total of six mornings. . .

Then: The next morning, must have been a first day!

Therefore: The day before the start of the fall of Manna must have been the seventh day, a Shabbat!!

Yah & Moshe were speaking on a Shabbat!

And Therefore: The quail coming in that coming evening “erev” and “bayn haerbaim”, must have had to be after sunset – just after Shabbat ended!!! If the quail would have been coming in, according to Rabbinical Jewish reckoning, at two or three pm then the Sabbath would have been broken, as the Shabbat ends with the sun setting.

The quail would have had to come with sunset & not before or else the Shabbat would have been broken! The sending of flesh would have had to occurred immediately after the ending the Shabbat! If this were not true, then he gave them quail to gather and dress on the Shabbat day?! Thereby causing or encouraging the breaking of his own Shabbat command and teaching the Israelites the lesson, that it is ok to break the Shabbat.

This is a very important point. The new day must start at the same time that "erev" [sunset] and "bayn haerbaim" as Yahuah gave them live quail that required killing and gutting a violation of Sabbath and its no personal work command. This surely shows that a new day begins at sunset and that erev, bayn haerbaim and sunset are all simultaneous occuring events.

That erev, bayn haerbaim and sunset, according to this Ex16 text, all occurred at precisely the same point of time, and is an extremely important Scriptural point for understanding.

TWO REASONS – THAT IT COULD NOT INCLUDE THE AFTERNOON

Exodus16:11-13 Yahuah said to Moses, 12 "I have heard the grumbling of the Israelites. Tell them, ` Between the two evenings (bayn haerbaim) you will eat meat, and in the morning you will be filled with bread. Then you will know that I am Yahuah your G-d.'" 13 That evening (baerev) quail came and covered the camp, and in the morning there was a layer of dew around the camp. (CPA-NIV)

Between the two evenings (bayn haerbaim) could not have been understood to be the afternoon for two reasons:

First - “Between the two evenings (bayn haerbaim) you will eat meat, and in the morning you will be filled with bread.” That the “meat”, the quail, came into the camp before the next morning/boquer when the manna fell is a fact according to the context. Also the quail would have had to have come in after sunset/ereb at the end of the previous day, for that previous day was a Shabbat. The dressing, tearing, preparing and/or cooking the quail would have been a Sabbath violation.

Second if he meant the Afternoon, then Yahuah mislead them, as the narrative clearly states at Ex16:13 “That evening (baerev sunset) the quail came…” that it was not done till after sunset is seen by the use of the Hebrew expression “baerev” (at/in evening) involving a Sabbath ending.

THIS IS CLEARLY INDICATING “TWILIGHT”

Therefore "between the two evenings" is according to verse 13 as something that would have to happen at/after sunset and before the next morning!!! Between the two evenings is the period of time between sunset and full dark, i.e. twilight time. The first evening being sunset [When the sun gives up dominion] and the second evening being the time the stars begin to be seen shining in the sky.

III – EX 12 PASSOVER FACTS

Not only have religious groups claiming to be based on the Hebrew Scriptures, refused to keep the passover command, but they have either erred on the reason for doing it or erred on the timing of it. Error tends to lend to further errors concerning the understanding of Yahuah’s other commands.

3 “… they shall take to them … a lamb for an house:”

5 Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the first year: ye shall take [it] out from the sheep, or from the goats:

Note! That every thing hereafter, from verses 6 thru 13 happens in the same night, a time period of the 14th day of 12 hours or so at the beginning of the fourteenth!  This is a very important point for understanding the Passover command. We know this to be true, because of the following evidence.

6 (Lambs Killed) And … the fourteenth day … shall kill it in the evening (bayn haerbayim).

7 (Houses Blood Marked) … of the blood, … the two side posts and on the upper door post …

8 That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs, and bread made without yeast. (NIV)

THAT SAME NIGHT ?

Note verse 8 states, "That same night" (KJV text) as regards the time of the eating of the animal. So the question arises, The same night as what? "The same night" as the immediately preceding Events. And what were these?

Verse 6 The night that the Lambs Killed.

Verse 7 The night that the houses were marked with the blood

Therefore in verse 8, where it says "That same night", it denotes that the Lamb is eaten in the same night it is killed and the same night its blood marks the house.

Exodus12:8 That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs, and bread made without yeast. (NIV)

The expression translated "that same night" is from the Hebrew expression "blailah hazeh". "B" is a prefix meaning "in" or "at" and "lailah" means "night".  "hazeh" is a combination of "ha" meaning "the" and "zeh" meaning “this”, and this “ha” prefix make the zeh emphatic is translated as "This same" and "this very". The Expression therefore means "in that same night" or "in that very night". In that night, not just any night but THAT night, the night the events listed in the previous verses took place!  Note the New International Version rendering of verses 8 and 12 of Exodus 12!!!

Note verse 12 also uses the expression "That same night" indicating that Yahuah's midnight strike against the Egyptians and his "passing over" the blood marked houses of the Israelites is the same night that the passover lamb is eaten. The eating of the Passover and Yahuah’s passing over the blood marked houses happened on the very same night!

Ex 12:12 (NIV) "On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn--both men and animals--and I will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. I am Yahuah.

ALL FIVE PASSOVER EVENTS HAPPEN ON THE VERY SAME NIGHT

The passover lamb is (1) killed, the (2) houses marked with blood, it is (3) roasted and (4) eaten, and Yah (5) "passes over" sparing Israel’s first born, all on the very same night!!!

If one thing happens, they all happen in the same twelve hour night!

WHAT IS THE PASSOVER NIGHT – the 14th or the 15th ???

No matter which date you choose, it is a one night stand, it has to be killed, roasted, eaten and the firstborn spared by Yahuah’s passing over (pasach) happen in one night.

Verse 6 nails the date of that night to the 14th of Abib.

Ex 12:6 -- And ye shall keep it up until (not past) the fourteenth day of the same month: and the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it in the evening.

You don’t keep it through the 14 by just UNTIL the fourteenth day. This indicates that it had to be killed on the fourteenth.  There is no question as to the date of the killing of the passover, that being the 14th of Aviv.

The "time" of during the 14th is settled by the fact that all events for Passover have to occur in one night period of time.

            1. It had to be killed Aviv 14.          [v. 6]

2. the houses were marked with the blood (v7)

            3&4. It had to be roasted & eaten "that same night".  [v. 8]

            5. Yah killed Egypt's firstborn "that same night". [v.12]

That one “night” was and is the 14th - the first 12 hours from sunset to sunrise.

Therefore the passover flockling has to be killed after sunset starting the 14th, during twilight.

Since all Passover events occur on the same night, that night would have to be Abib 14th. Both Scripture and logic demand it.

The passover lamb is killed, and eaten, and Yah "passes over" all on the very same night – the first 12 hours of the Passover day – 1st Month 14th Day! ! !

End Part 5 ~~~~~~